I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.
I use Emacs and NetBeans
-Mario.
···
--
I want to change the world but they won't give me the source code.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 20:30, sasan <sasan.bahrieh@gmail.com> wrote:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.
Hello Sasan:
I use TurboRuby ( http://www.embarcadero.com/products/turboruby ). It costs $49~ CND after the trial expires but that's worth it to me. I've used many other IDE's and editors but like this the best for my needs. There's also a Rails specific version called 3rdRail ( http://www.embarcadero.com/products/3rdrail ).
Michael
···
----- Original Message ----- From: "sasan" <sasan.bahrieh@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 12:26 PM
Subject: Ruby Editor
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.
sasan wrote:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.
Have not used this. but looks good.
Also just used Aptana in the past, or Text Mate
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
Vim?
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/328397
···
Am Sonntag, 23. Aug 2009, 03:30:44 +0900 schrieb sasan:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.
--
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
My favorite is Emacs, but Netbeans is good too especially if you are on
Windows where Emacs just does not quite fit.
···
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> wrote:
sasan wrote:
> I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
> me about the ruby software.Depends what platform you are on.
If you are on Windows, there was a recent thread listing a lot of
options:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/193184
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
sasan wrote:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.
vi/vim has both *nix and Windows, it's free, has been around forever and
is powerful.
What else?
Sorry could not resist!
R.
···
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Bertram Scharpf<lists@bertram-scharpf.de> wrote:
Am Sonntag, 23. Aug 2009, 03:30:44 +0900 schrieb sasan:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.Vim?
edlin! Uses less resources then any of the other editors people have
suggested. As a bonus, you'll learn very quickly not to make
mistakes. 
···
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Nathan Keel<nat.k@gm.ml> wrote:
sasan wrote:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.vi/vim has both *nix and Windows, it's free, has been around forever and
is powerful.
--
Aaron Turner
http://synfin.net/
http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/ - Pcap editing and replay tools for Unix & Windows
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin
Hi,
···
Am Freitag, 28. Aug 2009, 04:15:06 +0900 schrieb Nathan Keel:
sasan wrote:
> I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
> me about the ruby software.vi/vim has both *nix and Windows, it's free, has been around forever and
is powerful.
Vim is sure a matter of taste. I know that because I refused it
for a long time. A time much too long...
Bertram
--
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
gedit like textmate
http://blog.nationcode.com/articles/2008/04/06/gedit-como-textmate-mejorado-para-rails-en-gnu-linux
saludos
Aaron Turner wrote:
···
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Nathan Keel<nat.k@gm.ml> wrote:
sasan wrote:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.vi/vim has both *nix and Windows, it's free, has been around forever
and is powerful.edlin! Uses less resources then any of the other editors people have
suggested. As a bonus, you'll learn very quickly not to make
mistakes.
Never heard of that? Anyway, any text editor will work, but things like
vi/vim, gedit, etc. (free on Linux, and vim works on Windows), will
work fine. I guess it might depend on your OS.
Aaron Turner wrote:
···
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Nathan Keel<nat.k@gm.ml> wrote:
sasan wrote:
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.vi/vim has both *nix and Windows, it's free, has been around forever and
is powerful.edlin! Uses less resources then any of the other editors people have
suggested. As a bonus, you'll learn very quickly not to make
mistakes.
Personally I preferred UCEdit, University of Calgary Editor, but it only ran on a CDC Cyber series as far as I know. I loved being able to go to the 234th instance of 'the' and changing the next 5 instances to 'then' in a file with a single command. It made editing large files very easy.
Unfortunately I have never seen any editor close to it even though I used it in the late 70's.
Vim is sure a matter of taste. I know that because I refused it
for a long time. A time much too long...
Now this is subtle lobbying ;). But I am with you of course.
OTOH if you do not try out emacs you will never know what you like better.
And IIRC there are simply no other choices (1)(unless on MAC) ;).
R.
(1) For editors, IDEs are a different history that shall be told a
different time.
Vim is sure a matter of taste. I know that because I refused it for a
long time. A time much too long...Now this is subtle lobbying ;). But I am with you of course.
OTOH if you do not try out emacs you will never know what you like
better. And IIRC there are simply no other choices (1)(unless on MAC)
;). R.
IMHO they all suck, *especially* vim and emacs. However, I've found emacs
to be an excellent editor construction kit for rolling my own.
···
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:19:56 -0500, Robert Dober wrote:
(1) For editors, IDEs are a different history that shall be told a
different time.
I can't say I disagree, but I do like being able to control mpd and read
PDF's inside Emacs. Not to mention Emacs' ability to run as a daemon.
···
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:55 PM, pbj <postittothenewsgroup@nospam.com>wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:19:56 -0500, Robert Dober wrote:
>> Vim is sure a matter of taste. I know that because I refused it for a
>> long time. A time much too long...
> Now this is subtle lobbying ;). But I am with you of course.
>
> OTOH if you do not try out emacs you will never know what you like
> better. And IIRC there are simply no other choices (1)(unless on MAC)
> ;). R.IMHO they all suck, *especially* vim and emacs. However, I've found emacs
to be an excellent editor construction kit for rolling my own.>
> (1) For editors, IDEs are a different history that shall be told a
> different time.
Is it possible to add some text editors information on Ruby's official website?
I'm kind of tired of this kind of discussion unless something notable comes up.
Yeah but what shall we say to a newbie?
R.
···
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Hunt Jon<jona.hunt777@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it possible to add some text editors information on Ruby's official website?
I'm kind of tired of this kind of discussion unless something notable comes up.
point him to the wiki!
martin
···
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Robert Dober<robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Hunt Jon<jona.hunt777@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it possible to add some text editors information on Ruby's official website?
I'm kind of tired of this kind of discussion unless something notable comes up.
Yeah but what shall we say to a newbie?
Is it possible to add some text editors information on Ruby's official website?
I'm kind of tired of this kind of discussion unless something notable comes up.
Yeah but what shall we say to a newbie?
point him to the wiki!
ok I'll cross the i's and point the t's 
Sorry if you are tired about vim vs. emacs but that is somehow a "natural law".
What else shall we say than: Try vim, try emacs, try <fill in
choose what suits you better. The wiki pointing idea itself
has not been accepted so far. I suggested a Wiki for FAQs for
netiquette, but that point did not find any echo at all. I doubt it
will for the editor, but maybe ( and I would not mind at all ) I am
wrong.
Cheers
R.
···
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Martin DeMello<martindemello@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Robert Dober<robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Hunt Jon<jona.hunt777@gmail.com> wrote: