Dir.bitbucket?

ruby-talk
1

That's fine with me. If we're going to keep it pure Ruby, perhaps we
could put this in FileUtils?

Thanks,

Dan

This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies of the communication and any attachments.

···

-----Original Message-----
From: nobu@ruby-lang.org [mailto:nobu@ruby-lang.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 7:57 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: Dir.bitbucket?

Hi,

At Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:37:34 +0900,
Hal Fulton wrote in [ruby-talk:209823]:
> > Agreed. File would be a better location for the it.
> >
>
> Or even IO perhaps?

IO isn't always associated with a certain path.

I'd prefer File.null.

2

Hi,

At Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:56:47 +0900,
Berger, Daniel wrote in [ruby-talk:209874]:

> > > Agreed. File would be a better location for the it.
> > >
> >
> > Or even IO perhaps?
>
> IO isn't always associated with a certain path.
>
> I'd prefer File.null.

That's fine with me. If we're going to keep it pure Ruby, perhaps we
could put this in FileUtils?

In pure Ruby, Pathname might be the best.

···

--
Nobu Nakada