[ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1

Okay, thanks for irritating the people of the Ruby world. Please keep all
emails private that really have nothing important to contribute or are
personal attacks. This thread has gone on far too long. You don't want me
in on it. Okay thanks. Now show some respect and keep further emails in
this thread private --David Ross

Original Message:

···

-----------------
From: Sean O'Dell sean@celsoft.com
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:53:42 +0900
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
Subject: Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1

On Tuesday 15 June 2004 15:38, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

On Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 5:14:55 AM, Austin wrote:
> Rather, I am suggesting that *competition* in this case may not be
> the best approach, where *cooperation* works far better.

I wouldn't worry about that point too much. It's a pretty simple
package (not to belittle it) and if Nathaniel is interested in the
functionality, he knows where to find it.

>From what Sean has said, co-operation isn't the best option to satisfy

his requirements, and that's reasonable.

Thank you for respecting my own approach. I was beginning to feel as if no
one had the concept of respect for other people's ways of coding and
contributing.

  Sean O'Dell

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

Why didn't you send this to me as private email? Did it need to be posted
here?

  Sean O'Dell

···

On Tuesday 15 June 2004 15:57, dross@code-exec.net wrote:

Okay, thanks for irritating the people of the Ruby world. Please keep all
emails private that really have nothing important to contribute or are
personal attacks. This thread has gone on far too long. You don't want me
in on it. Okay thanks. Now show some respect and keep further emails in
this thread private --David Ross