Here's one I just got, I recall somebody was asking to see an example of
one.
Cheers,
Sam
I have about a thousand of these. Really really annoying.
···
On Mar 14, 2005, at 9:07 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
Here's one I just got, I recall somebody was asking to see an example of
one.Cheers,
SamFrom: MAILER-DAEMON@arch.dtop.jp
Date: March 14, 2005 8:05:13 PM EST
To: sroberts@uniserve.com
Subject: failure noticeHi. This is the qmail-send program at arch.dtop.jp.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.<tkc@arch.dtop.jp>:
qmail-local crashed.
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <sroberts@uniserve.com>
Received: (qmail 19217 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2005 23:39:11 -0000
Delivered-To: koyama@localhost
Received: (qmail 19095 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 23:39:07 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 23:39:07 -0000
Received: from cs0.catv.ne.jp [202.232.171.20]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.0.0)
for koyama@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:39:07 +0900 (JST)
Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org by cs0.catv.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W)
id XAA01419; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:37:53 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1])
by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BC9EA3441D; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:38:01 +0900 (JST)
Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 00498-01; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:38:01 +0900 (JST)
Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1])
by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7ECDA33EEB; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:37:58 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1])
by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49106340CA
for <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:37:50 +0900 (JST)
Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 32700-08 for <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>;
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:37:50 +0900 (JST)
Received: from tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts22.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.184])
by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2358E33EEB
for <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:37:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ensemble.local ([64.229.170.33])
by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <20050304143736.IDGK1919.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@ensemble.local>
for <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:37:36 -0500
Received: by ensemble.local (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 5DE8331D86D; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:37:05 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:37:50 +0900
Posted: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:37:05 -0500
From: Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com>
Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: ruby gems, and the require problem (was Re: RAA Status & b)
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
Message-Id: <20050304143705.GA7084@ensemble.local>
In-Reply-To: <9e7db91105030322432403c4da@mail.gmail.com> <20050304055654.GA67109@freeze.org>
References: <20050304045234.GA6970@ensemble.local> <BE4D5813.1FB54%rich@infoether.com> <20050304053639.GA7017@ensemble.local> <9e7db91105030322432403c4da@mail.gmail.com> <20050304045234.GA6970@ensemble.local> <BE4D5813.1FB54%rich@infoether.com> <20050304053639.GA7017@ensemble.local> <20050304055654.GA67109@freeze.org>
X-ML-Name: ruby-talk
X-Mail-Count: 132929
X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (only members can post)
X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body
"help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org;
help=<mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org?body=help>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Mail-Followup-To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on
beryllium.ruby-lang.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=7.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT,RCVDFRMLOCALIP autolearn=ham version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
Lines: 120
List-Id: ruby-talk.ruby-lang.org
List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]
List-Post: <mailto:ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:ruby-talk-admin@ruby-lang.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org?body=help>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org?body=unsubscribe>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ruby-lang.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-UIDL: m83!!S1&#!jN(#!'MZ"!Guys,
... chopped ...
Hey folks,
Shalev NessAiver wrote:
I have about a thousand of these. Really really annoying.
Received: from cs0.catv.ne.jp [202.232.171.20]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.0.0)
for koyama@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:39:07 +0900 (JST)
Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org by cs0.catv.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W)
id XAA01419; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:37:53 +0900 (JST)
As you can see from those headers, the mail was supposed to go to koyama@something,
most probably koyama@catv.ne.jp, and then gets forwarded to a mail address located at
the faulty mta which bounces it to the poster.
If someone has access to the list of subscribers of ruby-lang, he/she could check if
someone with the name of "koyama" is subscribed, and unsubscribe that address.
It's not very polite, but at least the bounces will stop. 
Kind regards,
Dennis Oelkers
···
On Mar 14, 2005, at 9:07 PM, Sam Roberts wrote: