[Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

hi all

i got this from an smtp server i have never heard of, I am assuming that
my original message has appeared in the list because it came back to me
thru the list.

I have seena recent mesage on bugtraq/incidents@securityfocus.com email
list, and have forwarded this there too.

does any1 have any ideas on what’s happened.

in the mean time I have blocked that domain.

regards
charles

···

-----Forwarded Message-----

From: Mail Delivery System Mailer-Daemon@ignoramus.co.uk
To: charlesb@summerfield-technology.co.uk
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: 03 Nov 2002 00:25:27 +0000

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

pipe to |/usr/bin/procmail
generated by ibraheem@localhost

The following text was generated during the delivery attempt:

------ pipe to |/usr/bin/procmail
generated by ibraheem@localhost ------

procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: charlesb@summerfield-technology.co.uk
Received: from localhost.localdomain
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=[vdURLRU3e9IFTDeJrdOYiv3EqAqabetD])
by ignoramus with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
id 1888Zy-0004er-00
for ibraheem@localhost; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:25:26 +0000
Received: from mail.btinternet.com [194.73.73.90]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for ibraheem@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:25:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from helium.ruby-lang.org ([210.251.121.214])
by aluminium with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #12)
id 1888Ze-0007Oi-00; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:25:09 +0000
Received: from helium.ruby-lang.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by helium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 482A916; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 09:25:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: from kilo.rb.xcalibre.co.uk (unknown [217.204.38.22])
by helium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEC411
for ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 09:24:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [194.222.98.175] (helo=enterprise.summerfield-technology.co.uk)
by kilo.rb.xcalibre.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #3)
id 1888Z7-00039A-00
for ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:24:34 +0000
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 09:24:59 +0900
Posted: 03 Nov 2002 00:24:26 +0000
From: Charles Blackburn charlesb@summerfield-technology.co.uk
Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: Ruby Hosting
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
Message-Id: 1036279560.12417.21.camel@enterprise
In-Reply-To: 20021102175759.12851.00002074@mb-fk.aol.com
References: slrnas8l96.jfg.AntiATField_adsgohere@www42.durchnull.de
20021102175759.12851.00002074@mb-fk.aol.com
X-ML-Name: ruby-talk
X-Mail-Count: 54708
X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (anyone can post)
X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body
“help” (without quotes) to the address ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org;
help=mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org?body=help
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_ORBZ version=2.20
X-Spam-Level:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Lines: 11
List-Id: ruby-talk.ruby-lang.org
List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]
List-Post: mailto:ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
List-Owner: mailto:ruby-talk-admin@ruby-lang.org
List-Help: mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org?body=help
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org?body=unsubscribe

On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 23:17, loats205 wrote:

ruby occupies more than one proccess? im looking for sugestions, so feel free
to suggest how it could be livable, im just taking the poll, not administrating
the host.

well i know it’s a stupid thought, but surely the login process takes upon at
least two processes just to get to a shell :stuck_out_tongue:

charles

btw i meant to add, i received the return notice twice even tho i only
sent the message once

charles