Protected groups include age, race, ethnicity, genetics, culture, religion, politics, marital or parental status, sex, orientation, disability, and others
— they do NOT include “member of a board of directors”.
Protected classes or groups do not include top posters.
Can y'all take this to a private thread and not include the ruby mailing list with this particular manner of time-wasting? It's not really the mailing list's purpose to serve as a soapbox for what irks you.
~Johnneylee
···
On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:54, Jeremy Kent <ibiwan@gmail.com> wrote:
Fine, plonk away!
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:52 AM Jon A. Lambert <jlambert@oh.rr.com> wrote:
Jeremy “Ibi-Wan” Kent wrote:
> I would like to clarify "protected classes” since several people were asking, and a few offered incorrect clarifications.
> Protected group - Wikipedia
> Protected Classes | California State Senate
> https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-501-5857
> Non-discrimination
>
> Protected groups include age, race, ethnicity, genetics, culture, religion, politics, marital or parental status, sex, orientation, disability, and others
> — they do NOT include “member of a board of directors”.
I haven’t heard any technical discourse or any relation to Ruby in a very long time. I am out. This 43 message thread about politics is disgusting. Cheers. Unsubscribe.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Gallimore
···
On Oct 4, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Johnneylee Rollins <johnneylee.rollins@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:54, Jeremy Kent <ibiwan@gmail.com> wrote:
Fine, plonk away!
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:52 AM Jon A. Lambert <jlambert@oh.rr.com> wrote:
Jeremy “Ibi-Wan” Kent wrote:
I would like to clarify "protected classes” since several people were asking, and a few offered incorrect clarifications.
Protected groups include age, race, ethnicity, genetics, culture, religion, politics, marital or parental status, sex, orientation, disability, and others
— they do NOT include “member of a board of directors”.
Can y'all take this to a private thread and not include the ruby mailing list with this particular manner of time-wasting? It's not really the mailing list's purpose to serve as a soapbox for what irks you.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:13 PM Nick Gallimore <nfgallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
I haven’t heard any technical discourse or any relation to Ruby in a very
long time. I am out. This 43 message thread about politics is disgusting.
Cheers. Unsubscribe.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Gallimore
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Johnneylee Rollins < > johnneylee.rollins@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:54, Jeremy Kent <ibiwan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fine, plonk away!
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:52 AM Jon A. Lambert <jlambert@oh.rr.com> > wrote:
>>> Jeremy “Ibi-Wan” Kent wrote:
>>> I would like to clarify "protected classes” since several people were
asking, and a few offered incorrect clarifications.
>>>
>> Protected group - Wikipedia
>>>
>> Protected Classes | California State Senate
>>> https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-501-5857
>>> Non-discrimination
>>>
>>> Protected groups include age, race, ethnicity, genetics, culture,
religion, politics, marital or parental status, sex, orientation,
disability, and others
>>> — they do NOT include “member of a board of directors”.
>
> Can y'all take this to a private thread and not include the ruby mailing
list with this particular manner of time-wasting? It's not really the
mailing list's purpose to serve as a soapbox for what irks you.
>
> ~Johnneylee
>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-talk-request@ruby-lang.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>
Can y'all take this to a private thread and not include the ruby mailing list with this particular manner of time-wasting? It's not really the mailing list's purpose to serve as a soapbox for what irks you.
I haven't posted on the list for years. So imagine my horror at seeing a huge thread complaining about some old joke where nearly all the posters are top posting and not even selective quoting. TOP POSTING for Christ's sake, in direct violation of the list's posting guides and all that is holy. Oh the humanity.
It’s so nice to see the old Usenet mindset is alive and well in the next
millennium!
···
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:52 PM Jon A. Lambert <jlambert@oh.rr.com> wrote:
Johnneylee Rollins wrote:
> Can y'all take this to a private thread and not include the ruby mailing
> list with this particular manner of time-wasting? It's not really the
> mailing list's purpose to serve as a soapbox for what irks you.
I haven't posted on the list for years. So imagine my horror at seeing a
huge thread complaining about some old joke where nearly all the posters
are
top posting and not even selective quoting. TOP POSTING for Christ's
sake,
in direct violation of the list's posting guides and all that is holy.
Oh
the humanity.
奻 is a very uncommon Kanji character in Japan (not even present in my dictionary program), more commonly it's spelled 言い争う where 言 has a meaning say and 争 to argue or dispute.
···
On 10/5/21 7:42 AM, Saji Hameed wrote:
I vote for the kanji radical to be replaced by that of a man. I suppose the result would not change that much!
Thanks, Mohamad!
saji
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:58 AM mohamad wael el kurdi > <mohamad.wael@gmail.com <mailto:mohamad.wael@gmail.com>> wrote:
![wlEmoticon-smile[1].png](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/standard17/uploads/rubytalk/original/2X/a/a74174f4acc5d2b83cc68c637ac3887c36fcd3d7.png){kind=small}
![wlEmoticon-smile[1].png|19x19](/uploads/short-url/nRBYElmPOH3GAZQNcDby6cStb4X.png){kind=link}