I’m very interested in Parrot, especially as it relates to debugging.
Debugging in scripting languages seems kind of shaky to me, with the
debugger being a script itself.
Is there any movement to adapt Ruby to generate Parrot bytecode at this
point?
Not much activity in the mailing list for the last 6 months (or more),
though.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:44:12AM +0900, robert ehteshamzadeh wrote:
I’m very interested in Parrot, especially as it relates to debugging.
Debugging in scripting languages seems kind of shaky to me, with the
debugger being a script itself.Is there any movement to adapt Ruby to generate Parrot bytecode at this
point?
–
_ _
__ __ | | ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __
'_ \ /| __/ __| '__ \ / ` | ’ \
) | (| | |__ \ | | | | | (| | | | |
.__/ _,|_|/| || ||_,|| |_|
Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com
“You, sir, are nothing but a pathetically lame salesdroid!
I fart in your general direction!”
– Randseed on #Linux
no need to run… you’re already there :
more than this… it seem to me that this is even working, apart from
parrot not being actually usable…
il Sat, 12 Jul 2003 11:28:06 -0700, “robert ehteshamzadeh” rehteshamzadeh@borland.com ha scritto::
I’m very interested in Parrot, especially as it relates to debugging.
Debugging in scripting languages seems kind of shaky to me, with the
debugger being a script itself.Is there any movement to adapt Ruby to generate Parrot bytecode at this
point?
In article vh0kpoj091l878@corp.supernews.com,
robert ehteshamzadeh rehteshamzadeh@borland.com wrote:
I’m very interested in Parrot, especially as it relates to debugging.
Debugging in scripting languages seems kind of shaky to me, with the
debugger being a script itself.Is there any movement to adapt Ruby to generate Parrot bytecode at this
point?
Check out the Cardinal project on RAA. It’s sort of on hold right now.
We’re waiting for object support in Parrot (well, to be honest, I’m too
busy with other things right now, so it’s a convenient excuse:)
Phil