[OG] [NITRO] - Mr. Moschovitis Revolutionary Redefinition of an Open Source Project

ruby-talk
1

George Moschovitis wrote
[
within thread:
Re: [Nitro] [OG] - 0.16.0 with automated table evolution
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.nitro.general/305
]

Thanks.

BTW, there is a code repository for Nitro/Og that includes the latest
version.

ok

This repository is open to a group of 5 developers that have
given me valuable suggestions, bug reports through private emails.

Open to 5 (five!!!) developers [= feedback contributors]

=> Bug Reporst via emails.

So there *are* people reviewing the new Og code.

5 - very impressive.

Moreover, I consider all
the suggestions posted to this list. If anyone on this list *really*
wants to see the latest code just send me an email and I can arrange
this.

I've seldom seen such an amateur insisting on his own inability.

Do you really think that I would _ask_ you for access to an open-source-project repository?

How ridiculous.

But I would advice to be patient, a new version will be released real
soon now (sic). It will not contain all the planned features but will
allow for broader review of the new code by all interested parties.

I would advice you to become serious and professional - and to cover at least general requirements for an open-source project.

I would additionally advice you, to remove immediately the moderation

···

from my account on the "nitro.general" list.

-

Status Quo:

Open Source Product, minimum Requirement: Open Source

Open Source Project, minimum Requirement: Open Source Repository

http://lazaridis.com/core/project/open.html

..

--
http://lazaridis.com

2

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/141481

···

On 5/7/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

George Moschovitis wrote

> Moreover, I consider all
> the suggestions posted to this list. If anyone on this list *really*
> wants to see the latest code just send me an email and I can arrange
> this.

I've seldom seen such an amateur insisting on his own inability.

Do you really think that I would _ask_ you for access to an
open-source-project repository?

How ridiculous.

On 5/6/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

anyone intrested can get the file, simply by droping me a private email.

--
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)

3

Is there a way of moderating Mr. Lazardis' comments to the group so that we don't have to wade through piffle?

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

···

George Moschovitis wrote
[
within thread:
Re: [Nitro] [OG] - 0.16.0 with automated table evolution
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.nitro.general/305
]

Thanks.
BTW, there is a code repository for Nitro/Og that includes the latest
version.

ok

This repository is open to a group of 5 developers that have
given me valuable suggestions, bug reports through private emails.

Open to 5 (five!!!) developers [= feedback contributors]

=> Bug Reporst via emails.

So there *are* people reviewing the new Og code.

5 - very impressive.

Moreover, I consider all
the suggestions posted to this list. If anyone on this list *really*
wants to see the latest code just send me an email and I can arrange
this.

I've seldom seen such an amateur insisting on his own inability.

Do you really think that I would _ask_ you for access to an open-source-project repository?

How ridiculous.

But I would advice to be patient, a new version will be released real
soon now (sic). It will not contain all the planned features but will
allow for broader review of the new code by all interested parties.

I would advice you to become serious and professional - and to cover at least general requirements for an open-source project.

I would additionally advice you, to remove immediately the moderation from my account on the "nitro.general" list.

-

Status Quo:

Open Source Product, minimum Requirement: Open Source

Open Source Project, minimum Requirement: Open Source Repository

http://lazaridis.com/core/project/open.html

.

4

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

George Moschovitis wrote
[
within thread:
Re: [Nitro] [OG] - 0.16.0 with automated table evolution
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.nitro.general/305
]

Thanks.
BTW, there is a code repository for Nitro/Og that includes the latest
version.

ok

This repository is open to a group of 5 developers that have
given me valuable suggestions, bug reports through private emails.

Open to 5 (five!!!) developers [= feedback contributors]

And when those 5 people stuck giving feedback, Mr. Moschovitis cames up behind the curtain:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.nitro.general/331

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.nitro.general/332

to disapear in the next moment again (possibly with a 6th member in the close-source-project "Nitro/Og").

[btw: as expected, the next version of "Og" has excessive delays.]

···

=> Bug Reporst via emails.

So there *are* people reviewing the new Og code.

5 - very impressive.

Moreover, I consider all
the suggestions posted to this list. If anyone on this list *really*
wants to see the latest code just send me an email and I can arrange
this.

I've seldom seen such an amateur insisting on his own inability.

Do you really think that I would _ask_ you for access to an open-source-project repository?

How ridiculous.

But I would advice to be patient, a new version will be released real
soon now (sic). It will not contain all the planned features but will
allow for broader review of the new code by all interested parties.

I would advice you to become serious and professional - and to cover at least general requirements for an open-source project.

I would additionally advice you, to remove immediately the moderation from my account on the "nitro.general" list.

-

Status Quo:

Open Source Product, minimum Requirement: Open Source

Open Source Project, minimum Requirement: Open Source Repository

http://lazaridis.com/core/project/open.html

.

--
http://lazaridis.com

5

Bill Guindon wrote:

George Moschovitis wrote

Moreover, I consider all
the suggestions posted to this list. If anyone on this list *really*
wants to see the latest code just send me an email and I can arrange
this.

I've seldom seen such an amateur insisting on his own inability.

Do you really think that I would _ask_ you for access to an
open-source-project repository?

How ridiculous.

anyone intrested can get the file, simply by droping me a private email.

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/141481

you are a little confused, aren't you?

comparing action with reaction.

"
[as a protest to the non-existent public code-repository and to
non-supporting my efforts on the project-forum (no responses), I've not
followed Mr. Moschovitis request to sent him the file]
"

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/141448

···

On 5/7/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:
On 5/6/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

-

Independent of the above:

_I_ am not a publically announced open-source-project.

..

--
http://lazaridis.com

6

Paul Hanchett wrote:

Is there a way of moderating Mr. Lazardis' comments to the group so that we don't have to wade through piffle?

wake up.

usenet is nothing for weak puppets.

it's censorship-free.

..

···

--
http://lazaridis.com

7

Sorry, just read this.

If you're using Mail.app just add a rule:

If <any> of the following conditions are met:

  From Contains illias@lazaridis.com

Perform the following actions:

  Delete Message

or Move message to mailbox: Spam

The point is, if you're annoyed by it, do something about it.
Most email clients can do something similar to this.

While I agree that this is not ideal, the whole mailing list system would
need reworking to completely eliminate someone entirely (that's just how
I understand it anyway).

-Shalev

···

On May 7, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Paul Hanchett wrote:

Is there a way of moderating Mr. Lazardis' comments to the group so that we don't have to wade through piffle?

8

Definitely! You are an *idiot*

···

On Saturday 07 May 2005 20:34, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

_I_ am not a publically announced open-source-project.

--
sdmitry -=- Dmitry V. Sabanin

9

Shalev NessAiver, May 13:

If <any> of the following conditions are met:

  From Contains illias@lazaridis.com

⋮

This only captures messages from illias himself, not people who have
responded to threads started by him. What most people want is to ignore
the threads as a whole, not just illias posts to it,
        nikolai

···

--
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/\!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

10

Dmitry V. Sabanin wrote:

···

On Saturday 07 May 2005 20:34, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

_I_ am not a publically announced open-source-project.

Definitely! You are an *idiot*

And I was hoping this list could avoid the same stream of crap that plagued ruby-talk.

James

11

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

Shalev NessAiver, May 13:

If <any> of the following conditions are met:

From Contains illias@lazaridis.com

This only captures messages from illias himself, not people who have responded to threads started by him. What most people want is to
ignore the threads as a whole, not just illias posts to it, nikolai

http://lazaridis.com/core/eval/filter.html

..

···

--
http://lazaridis.com

12

James Britt wrote:

Dmitry V. Sabanin wrote:

_I_ am not a publically announced open-source-project.

Definitely! You are an *idiot*

And I was hoping this list could avoid the same stream of crap that plagued ruby-talk.

James

Whow!

what an excellent fact-oriented analytical conversation.

..

···

On Saturday 07 May 2005 20:34, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

--
http://lazaridis.com

13

It's a pity -- you should also include the sporadic posts you held on
the netbeans list as well. That way, one can make the comparison
between your removal, too.

-- Thomas Adam

···

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:30:29AM +0900, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>Shalev NessAiver, May 13:
>
>
>>If <any> of the following conditions are met:
>>
>>From Contains illias@lazaridis.com
>
>This only captures messages from illias himself, not people who have
>responded to threads started by him. What most people want is to
>ignore the threads as a whole, not just illias posts to it, nikolai

http://lazaridis.com/core/eval/filter.html

--
"One of us is a cigar stand, and one of us is a lovely blue incandescent
guillotine" -- Stephen Malkmus, "Type Slowly" from "Brighten The Corners"

14

Ilias Lazaridis farted:

what an excellent fact-oriented analytical conversation.

..

..
Open source manifesto
...
Section 9 - Responsibilities ...
17/J - Open source is not a suicide pact with idiots, imbeciles,
  morons or retarded squirrels. ...

Error raised - Section 9-17/J

···

-
click - closing...

whirrrrr...grind

-
        ("Helps us! Puuuleeze helps us complete our evaluations! Waaa! Mean and nasty rubyistses! Braaap!")
      /
(_o_) <---Ilias

-
..

--
J. Lambert

15

Thomas Adam wrote:

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

Shalev NessAiver, May 13:

If <any> of the following conditions are met:

From Contains illias@lazaridis.com

This only captures messages from illias himself, not people who have
responded to threads started by him. What most people want is to
ignore the threads as a whole, not just illias posts to it, nikolai

http://lazaridis.com/core/eval/filter.html

It's a pity -- you should also include the sporadic posts you held on
the netbeans list as well.

I would not call it 'sporadic'.

I wrote around 6 weeks fulltime within netbeans.

you can follow the links for the java evaluation.

that will bring you to the netbeans threads.

http://lazaridis.com/core/eval/index.html

That way, one can make the comparison
between your removal, too.

the most impressive (to me) censorship was this form the eclipse foundation:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.softwaretools/msg/ae6315fda51d50a1

..

···

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:30:29AM +0900, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

--
http://lazaridis.com