The documentation page for Module is missing from http://ruby-doc.org/core/.
Is this intended? Lots of method links are broken because of this.
Jason
This is an old error, that nobody seems to look into. Search for James
Britt's posts on this on ruby-core.
···
On 3/13/07, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@gmail.com> wrote:
The documentation page for Module is missing from http://ruby-doc.org/core/\.
Is this intended? Lots of method links are broken because of this.
Jason
Jan Svitok wrote:
···
On 3/13/07, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@gmail.com> wrote:
The documentation page for Module is missing from http://ruby-doc.org/core/\.
Is this intended? Lots of method links are broken because of this.
Jason
This is an old error, that nobody seems to look into. Search for James
Britt's posts on this on ruby-core.
I updated ruby-doc.org so that it used 1.8.6 for the api docs. After running rdoc I saw that Module was again missing. With 1.8.5 I was able to fix this by replacing a :stopdoc: in lib/yaml/tag.rb with method-specific :nodoc: calls. 1.8.6 has the same directives as 1.8.5, and I think that is the culprit
But when I tried this with 1.8.6 it didn't seem to change anything.
--
James Britt
"Design depends largely on constraints."
- Charles Eames
Jan Svitok wrote:
···
On 3/13/07, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@gmail.com> wrote:
The documentation page for Module is missing from http://ruby-doc.org/core/\.
Is this intended? Lots of method links are broken because of this.
Jason
This is an old error, that nobody seems to look into. Search for James
Britt's posts on this on ruby-core.
Module is back.
I re-applied my patch and re-gen'ed the rdoc for 1.8.6
That is now the API shown for
For 1.8.5 docs, use
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.8.5/
--
James Britt
"I never dispute another person's delusions, just their facts."
- Len Bullard
James Britt wrote:
I updated ruby-doc.org so that it used 1.8.6 for the api docs. After running rdoc I saw that Module was again missing. With 1.8.5 I was able to fix this by replacing a :stopdoc: in lib/yaml/tag.rb with method-specific :nodoc: calls. 1.8.6 has the same directives as 1.8.5, and I think that is the culprit
But when I tried this with 1.8.6 it didn't seem to change anything.
Actually, that may not be true; I may have goofed in my re-doc'ing script. I'm lokking at it now.
···
--
James Britt
"Trying to port the desktop metaphor to the Web is like working
on how to fuel your car with hay because that is what horses eat."
- Dare Obasanjo
Module is back.
I re-applied my patch and re-gen'ed the rdoc for 1.8.6
That is now the API shown for
For 1.8.5 docs, use
Thank you James!
--
James Britt"I never dispute another person's delusions, just their facts."
- Len Bullard
Robert
···
On 3/14/07, James Britt <james.britt@gmail.com> wrote:
--
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw
Thank you! Actually I recall when you did the modification sometime
ago... I'm sorry for misinformation.
J.
···
On 3/14/07, James Britt <james.britt@gmail.com> wrote:
Jan Svitok wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The documentation page for Module is missing from
>> http://ruby-doc.org/core/\.
>>
>> Is this intended? Lots of method links are broken because of this.
>>
>> Jason
>
> This is an old error, that nobody seems to look into. Search for James
> Britt's posts on this on ruby-core.
>
Module is back.I re-applied my patch and re-gen'ed the rdoc for 1.8.6
That is now the API shown for
For 1.8.5 docs, use