Ri content mistake? (was Re: silly question)

ruby-talk
1

You're looking for Module::included, used like:

I was curious about Module#included, so I tried ri, and got this:

[snip]

Same thing appears also at ruby-doc.org.
I know the method works, but the docos seems skewed.
I've already posted this to roby-doc mailing list.

2

Mehr, Assaph (Assaph) wrote:

You're looking for Module::included, used like:

I was curious about Module#included, so I tried ri, and got this:

[snip]

Same thing appears also at ruby-doc.org.

Natch' as the docs come from the same source.

I know the method works, but the docos seems skewed.
I've already posted this to roby-doc mailing list.

Thanks, I just see it appearing now.

But there's no assurance that the people responsible for correcting this follow the ruby-doc list.

James