am i the only one who did not see this message
??
regards.
-a
···
--
in order to be effective truth must penetrate like an arrow - and that is
likely to hurt. -- wei wu wei
Hmm, no, I didn't get it either. I just checked on the Gateway though and it *seems* to be OK.
James Edward Gray II
···
On Oct 5, 2006, at 9:29 AM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
am i the only one who did not see this message
??
am i the only one who did not see this message
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/9b98e6e0e36f7dd4/83b498dce4c5c64f#83b498dce4c5c64f??
regards.
Um, no. But then I don't subscribe to comp.lang.ruby. Are you
confusing newsgroups with mailing lists?
Martin
Martin, there is a gateway that takes posts from the newsgroup and relays them to the mailing list, and vice versa, so that participants in either are defacto participants in both.
Kirk Haines
···
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Martin Coxall wrote:
am i the only one who did not see this message
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/9b98e6e0e36f7dd4/83b498dce4c5c64f#83b498dce4c5c64f??
regards.
Um, no. But then I don't subscribe to comp.lang.ruby. Are you
confusing newsgroups with mailing lists?
has anyone written a script to scrape the group via google groups or a usenet
server and to compare this against a local inbox? such a beast, which worked
by default against a 7 day back window and cron'd daily would be useful to
catch such sync errors no?
regards.
-a
···
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 9:29 AM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
am i the only one who did not see this message
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/ thread/9b98e6e0e36f7dd4/83b498dce4c5c64f#83b498dce4c5c64f
??
Hmm, no, I didn't get it either. I just checked on the Gateway though and it *seems* to be OK.
James Edward Gray II
--
in order to be effective truth must penetrate like an arrow - and that is
likely to hurt. -- wei wu wei
no: they are managed in such a way that they mirror each other. that's why
people complain so loudly when people top-post, changed headers, and other
activities that wreak havoc on people's mailers. it's unfortunate that
whatever software people use to interact with the newsgroup does not inform
them that, by posting to a group as you just did, you are also hitting
thousands of people's inboxes.
-a
···
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Martin Coxall wrote:
Um, no. But then I don't subscribe to comp.lang.ruby. Are you
confusing newsgroups with mailing lists?Martin
--
in order to be effective truth must penetrate like an arrow - and that is
likely to hurt. -- wei wu wei
> Um, no. But then I don't subscribe to comp.lang.ruby. Are you
> confusing newsgroups with mailing lists?Martin, there is a gateway that takes posts from the newsgroup and relays
them to the mailing list, and vice versa, so that participants in either
are defacto participants in both.
Ah, then it don't works. My apologies.
Martin