Hi all,
It appears that messages posted to google groups are not making it the
ML again.
Can we please fix? Thanks.
Dan
Hi all,
It appears that messages posted to google groups are not making it the
ML again.
Yep, it sure is broken. I'm also getting some sort of bounce messages?
Can we please fix? Thanks.
Dan
E
···
On Thu, March 10, 2005 9:38 pm, Berger, Daniel said:
Hey folks,
ES wrote:
···
On Thu, March 10, 2005 9:38 pm, Berger, Daniel said:
Hi all,
It appears that messages posted to google groups are not making it the
ML again.
Yep, it sure is broken. I'm also getting some sort of bounce messages?
If you supply me with some msg-ids and/or subjects, I will investigate it, and check if there really
is a problem at the gateway.
Anyway: the gateway does not send bounce messages of any kind to anyone.
Kind regards,
Dennis Oelkers
If you supply me with some msg-ids and/or subjects, I will investigate it, and check if there really is a problem at the gateway.
The gateway has been one way for several days now. A quick trip to Google Groups shows it well. I had a lot of trouble with this during this weeks Ruby Quiz. Here's the two submissions that never came to the mailing list:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/msg/65a71c96a50491e3
and
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/msg/3bcab05c47d47bc6
Anyway: the gateway does not send bounce messages of any kind to anyone.
I too am seeing this odd behavior, whatever the cause.
James Edward Gray II
···
On Mar 10, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Dennis Oelkers wrote:
Dennis Oelkers wrote:
Hey folks,
ES wrote:
Hi all,
It appears that messages posted to google groups are not making it the
ML again.
Yep, it sure is broken. I'm also getting some sort of bounce messages?If you supply me with some msg-ids and/or subjects, I will investigate it, and check if there really
is a problem at the gateway.
Anyway: the gateway does not send bounce messages of any kind to anyone.Kind regards,
Dennis Oelkers
One example: the recent thread on "priority queue using RBTree". My posts to the list went to the list and ng. The reply from Arah Howard was not forwarded to the list (I only found out about it because he addressed it to me as well).
Thanks!
···
On Thu, March 10, 2005 9:38 pm, Berger, Daniel said:
--
Joel VanderWerf California PATH, UC Berkeley
mailto:vjoel@path.berkeley.edu Ph. (510) 231-9446
http://www.path.berkeley.edu FAX (510) 231-9565
Hey folks,
ES wrote:
Hi all,
It appears that messages posted to google groups are not making it the
ML again.Yep, it sure is broken. I'm also getting some sort of bounce messages?
If you supply me with some msg-ids and/or subjects, I will investigate
it, and check if there really
is a problem at the gateway.
Anyway: the gateway does not send bounce messages of any kind to anyone.
I think I may have deleted all the bounces, I'll take a look. They're
coming from a japanese qmail server that states the message has been
in the queue for too long, To: my ruby-ml address. I don't think that
I have return receipts turned on or anything.
Kind regards,
Dennis Oelkers
E
···
On Thu, March 10, 2005 10:38 pm, Dennis Oelkers said:
On Thu, March 10, 2005 9:38 pm, Berger, Daniel said:
Any word on the status of the gateway? Thanks.
James Edward Gray II
···
On Mar 10, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Dennis Oelkers wrote:
If you supply me with some msg-ids and/or subjects, I will investigate it, and check if there really is a problem at the gateway.
Hey James,
James Edward Gray II wrote:
Anyway: the gateway does not send bounce messages of any kind to anyone.
I too am seeing this odd behavior, whatever the cause.
It would be helpful if you (or anyone else receiving any bounces) would forward them
to me (keeping all headers as they are), so I can check out if they really originate at the
gateway.
Kind regards,
Dennis Oelkers
To be clear though, these messages ARE showing up on the mailing list, then I get a bounce notice days later.
James Edward Gray II
···
On Mar 10, 2005, at 5:23 PM, ES wrote:
I think I may have deleted all the bounces, I'll take a look. They're
coming from a japanese qmail server that states the message has been
in the queue for too long, To: my ruby-ml address. I don't think that
I have return receipts turned on or anything.
Any word on the status of the gateway? Thanks.
James Edward Gray II
No quiz posts have been sent to c.l.r but not the ML yet.
I see three solutions both ways:
- Matthew Moss
- Glenn Parker
- Dave Burt
Any word on the status of the gateway?
Apparently it's unidirectional : work only ruby-talk ==> clr
See for example the thread
"[newby] class variables and class instance variable?"
on google
Guy Decoux
Dennis Oelkers wrote:
Hey James,
James Edward Gray II wrote:
Anyway: the gateway does not send bounce messages of any kind to anyone.
I too am seeing this odd behavior, whatever the cause.
It would be helpful if you (or anyone else receiving any bounces) would forward them
to me (keeping all headers as they are), so I can check out if they really originate at the
gateway.
I've seen this -- my impression has been that it's a symptom of
the mailing list itself.
Hal
Hey ts, hey list,
ts wrote:
Any word on the status of the gateway?
Apparently it's unidirectional : work only ruby-talk ==> clr
See for example the thread
"[newby] class variables and class instance variable?"
on google
You are absolutely right, due to the fact that I was out of office
for a few days, I didn't notice that I had left the script in "do nothing,
just log what you would you" debugmode, stupid me!
Nonetheless, all missing postings from the group should reach the
list in the next minutes.
Kind regards (and sorry!),
Dennis Oelkers
Hal Fulton wrote:
I've seen this -- my impression has been that it's a symptom of
the mailing list itself.
Yes, those bounces are definitely not related to the gateway at all.
I guess they result from a subscribes broken mta which is using the
return-path to send the bounce to the original posted instead of the
mailing list host.
Kind regards,
Dennis Oelkers
In data 3/15/2005, "Dennis Oelkers" <dennis@lauschmusik.de> ha scritto:
Hey ts, hey list,
ts wrote:
Any word on the status of the gateway?
Apparently it's unidirectional : work only ruby-talk ==> clr
See for example the thread
"[newby] class variables and class instance variable?"
on google
You are absolutely right, due to the fact that I was out of office
for a few days, I didn't notice that I had left the script in "do nothing,
just log what you would you" debugmode, stupid me!Nonetheless, all missing postings from the group should reach the
list in the next minutes.
Indeed they did, unfortunately in some arbitrary semi-inverse order 
Kind regards (and sorry!),
Dennis Oelkers
No problem, thanks for the service!
E
Dennis Oelkers <dennis@lauschmusik.de> writes:
Hal Fulton wrote:
I've seen this -- my impression has been that it's a symptom of
the mailing list itself.Yes, those bounces are definitely not related to the gateway at all.
I guess they result from a subscribes broken mta which is using the
return-path to send the bounce to the original posted instead of the
mailing list host.Kind regards,
Dennis Oelkers
I already mailed the ml admins to remove that particular subscription,
but didn't get any reply yet.
That paricular host (arch.dtop.jp) drops mail to postmaster, btw.
···
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
Hello,
I already mailed the ml admins to remove that particular subscription,
but didn't get any reply yet.
I think I missed your mail.
That paricular host (arch.dtop.jp) drops mail to postmaster, btw.
We don't have any subscribe member from dtop.jp. Maybe he is
forwarding his mail.
matz.
···
In message "Re: Gateway broken?" on Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:41:24 +0900, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
>That paricular host (arch.dtop.jp) drops mail to postmaster, btw.
We don't have any subscribe member from dtop.jp. Maybe he is
forwarding his mail.
I guess it's time for another line in my fetchmailrc then. :-/