And here I thought you were being ironicle. 
Dan
···
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Sullivan [mailto:unixwzrd@mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 11:16 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: Indentation vs. "end"s
Somehow my first message got swallowed up...
Never thought about it really, but that would have been the "end" of it...
Mike (who'll now go back to lurking...)
···
On Feb 3, 2006, at 03:18 , Berger, Daniel wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Sullivan [mailto:unixwzrd@mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 11:16 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: Indentation vs. "end"s
Somehow my first message got swallowed up...
And here I thought you were being ironicle. 
Dan
I like Ruby just the way it is.
I like Ruby just the way it is.
Ruby is Ruby not a copy of others.
By the way: Transmitting Python scripts via Web pages or such alike
and being urged to cute'n'paste them into an ascii editor (since
otherwise we git a "Save As" html code ... not ascii) is really
pain since the syntax get burried under "To be space or not to be space"...
("Space wars II...The return of the TAB" or something like that...)
The "End"s are makeing Ruby bullet proof concerning alternate
transmission ways.....may be solid enough to be sent as morse code 
I like ruby due to the fact it is Ruby !
My two cents only....
mcc
···
From: Jeff Barczewski <jeff.barczewski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Indentation vs. "end"s
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 03:53:52 +0900