Hash.each and hash.each_pair

I looked at RDoc documentation.

It says "each_pair" method is marginally more efficient.

Do we need to abandon "each"? Do you use "each" or stick to "each_pair"?

I do not care.

Kind regards

robert

···

2008/12/18 Hunt Jon <jona.hunt777@gmail.com>:

I looked at RDoc documentation.

It says "each_pair" method is marginally more efficient.

Do we need to abandon "each"? Do you use "each" or stick to "each_pair"?

--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end

* Hunt Jon <jona.hunt777@gmail.com> (2008-12-18) schrieb:

I looked at RDoc documentation.

It says "each_pair" method is marginally more efficient.

Do we need to abandon "each"? Do you use "each" or stick to "each_pair"?

»each_pair« is the better name for what it's doing and »each« is a standard
name used by »for« and »Enumeration«.

mfg, simon .... l