Me and a friend realised earlier today that this is actually a legal
Ruby program:
foo(def foo(a=nil)
puts "hello"
end)
foo
The fact that this works seems to be a side effect of Ruby's semantics
rather than an intended feature, but maybe it's actually useful to be
able to do this? I can't think of any (practical) use of it -
suggestions are welcome.
That's pretty interesting. It makes for some interesting recursion too
irb(main):021:0> foo(def foo(a=nil)
irb(main):022:2> puts a
irb(main):023:2> a += 1 if not a.nil?
irb(main):024:2> return a
irb(main):025:2> end)
nil
=> nil
irb(main):026:0> foo(foo(foo(foo(foo(foo(1))))))
1
2
3
4
5
6
=> 7
···
On 10/20/05, Anders Höckersten <chucky@dtek.chalmers.se> wrote:
Me and a friend realised earlier today that this is actually a legal
Ruby program:
foo(def foo(a=nil)
puts "hello"
end)
foo
The fact that this works seems to be a side effect of Ruby's semantics
rather than an intended feature, but maybe it's actually useful to be
able to do this? I can't think of any (practical) use of it -
suggestions are welcome.
Me and a friend realised earlier today that this is actually a legal
Ruby program:
foo(def foo(a=nil)
puts "hello"
end)
foo
The fact that this works seems to be a side effect of Ruby's semantics
rather than an intended feature, but maybe it's actually useful to be
able to do this? I can't think of any (practical) use of it -
suggestions are welcome.
Regards,
Anders
neat. i experimented a bit an found this one:
irb(main):027:0> foo def foo(o); o+'o'; end || foo('f')
=> "foo"
interestingly, 'or' and || are not the same:
irb(main):030:0> nil or 'fo'
=> "fo"
irb(main):031:0> nil || 'fo'
=> "fo"
irb(main):032:0> foo(nil or 'fo')
SyntaxError: compile error
(irb):32: syntax error
foo(nil or 'fo')
^
(irb):32: syntax error
from (irb):32
from (null):0
irb(main):033:0> foo(nil || 'fo')
=> "foo"