Content Managing System in Ruby

Is there a reason for duplicating work and wasting precious time?

Frameworks ease how much you have to code. Depending on what the framework
provides from authentication, session handling, to database accessing.
Using a framework for a CMS would definitately make it easier to create.
Without a framework you are asking for trouble later in the end.

--dross

Original Message:

···

-----------------
From: Mathieu Blondel matt@enlevemoica.ffworld.com
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 02:04:48 +0900
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
Subject: Re: Content Managing System in Ruby

  > They exist. They may not be publically released, but they exist.

In fact, I would prefer to see public ones :slight_smile:

Paul Vudmaska (paul, are you still lurking?) has a nice looking system

that

he created for a bunch of his clients. It's done directly with
mod_ruby/eruby without the benefit of any other framework. That one is,

or

was, publically available at some version. If Paul isn't listening, I'll
see if I can find out what the state of that is and report back.

I may end up to do a CMS for my site and in this case I would release it
publically.

I think I wouldn't use big frameworks either.

Some features I need would be :
- XML based structures content
- Good metadata system
- Roles and rights (abouts users and files)
- i18n
- workflows
- versionning
- groupware

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .