Hello,
is there any framework that makes it easier to write non trivial
forms. In the python world i like the FunFormKit which makes it easy
to define validators and helps me building the web-based GUI.
Any way to integrate such a thing with Amrita or an Amrita like (pure
HTML) template engine ?
···
--
Best regards, emailto: scholz at scriptolutions dot com
Lothar Scholz http://www.ruby-ide.com
CTO Scriptolutions Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's
Cerise, which uses Amrita for templates, has such a thing, if I recall
correctly. I'm working on such a thing for Iowa, but it's not ready for
even a private peekaboo release, yet.
Kirk Haines
···
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:57:40 +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote
Hello,
is there any framework that makes it easier to write non trivial
forms. In the python world i like the FunFormKit which makes it easy
to define validators and helps me building the web-based GUI.
Any way to integrate such a thing with Amrita or an Amrita like (pure
HTML) template engine ?
Mine is not used by anyone I know (including me), but:
See the ValidForm library at http://phrogz.net/RubyLibs/
···
On Jun 29, 2004, at 5:57 AM, Lothar Scholz wrote:
is there any framework that makes it easier to write non trivial
forms. In the python world i like the FunFormKit which makes it easy
to define validators and helps me building the web-based GUI.
That looks pretty neat - did it prove not to be useful in practice or
have you just not had any occasion to use it yet? Also how about other
output formats? For example a version emitting tk would be great for
quickly throwing together a small gui frontend to collect options to a
complex unix command or dotfile.
martin
···
Gavin Kistner <gavin@refinery.com> wrote:
On Jun 29, 2004, at 5:57 AM, Lothar Scholz wrote:
> is there any framework that makes it easier to write non trivial
> forms. In the python world i like the FunFormKit which makes it easy
> to define validators and helps me building the web-based GUI.
Mine is not used by anyone I know (including me), but:
See the ValidForm library at http://phrogz.net/RubyLibs/
See the ValidForm library at http://phrogz.net/RubyLibs/
That looks pretty neat - did it prove not to be useful in practice or
have you just not had any occasion to use it yet?
I just haven't had occasion to use it yet. (The Ruby web project I was building it in anticipation of has been much-delayed.) It worked nicely in my tests.
Also how about other output formats?
Be my guest! Different output is precisely why I kept the to_html method decoupled from the main library in its own file. 
···
On Jun 30, 2004, at 5:17 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
Gavin Kistner <gavin@refinery.com> wrote: