Not yet as far as I know. I do plan on creating a Ruby port of Bug
Traction when I have more time, but at this moment, I simply don't
have the time to work on it. I will seriously be looking at the
available application frameworks when I do so (mostly for the
database layer, as I'm reasonably happy with the presentation layer
that I have for Ruwiki).
-austin
···
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:37:21 +0900, J. D. <jd@nospam.com> wrote:
Are there any free bug/issue trackers written in Ruby?
For comparison, Python has at least two really nice ones (trac and
roundup):
I've been working on bug tracking system for sometime. This is the URL of the demo version: http://bugtrack.homeunix.net. If you are interested, I can prepare the tar of the current source code.
Cheers,
Kent.
···
On Dec 12, 2004, at 1:37 PM, J. D. wrote:
Hi,
Are there any free bug/issue trackers written in Ruby?
For comparison, Python has at least two really nice ones (trac and roundup):
Very nice! I understood the entire application without needing to
think, and everything nicely laid out.
A few glitches here and there, but mostly very smooth and functional.
Do you plan on putting it up into RubyForge?
Regards,
Nick
···
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:17:58 +0900, Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@bellsouth.net> wrote:
I've been working on bug tracking system for sometime. This is the URL
of the demo version: http://bugtrack.homeunix.net. If you are
interested, I can prepare the tar of the current source code.
Thanks. There are definitely a lot of things missing but I spent only two week of doing it. I probably should create a project on RubyForge. The only thing that I'm waiting for right now is for DHH to put up a new version of Rails 0.9. So I can upgrade it and use some of those shiny new features.
Cheers,
Kent.
···
On Dec 13, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Nicholas Van Weerdenburg wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:17:58 +0900, Kent Sibilev > <ksibilev@bellsouth.net> wrote:
I've been working on bug tracking system for sometime. This is the URL
of the demo version: http://bugtrack.homeunix.net. If you are
interested, I can prepare the tar of the current source code.
Cheers,
Kent.
Very nice! I understood the entire application without needing to
think, and everything nicely laid out.
A few glitches here and there, but mostly very smooth and functional.
I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.
However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.
As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
should savor such moments.
So, do you have a Ruby app that parses each message number and examines it for extra numerical flavor?
No -- in this case I happened to notice because I was discussing
another message by number and noticed that it was slightly over
123456. In the old days it was easier since the numbers were in the
subjects
ignore *
unignore from: date subject to cc
unignore organization organisation x-mailer: x-newsreader:
x-mailing-list:
unignore posted-to:
unignore X-Bogosity:
unignore X-Mail-Count:
^---- that's it.
//Anders
···
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:45:04PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, James Britt wrote:
>David A. Black wrote:
>>Hi --
>>
>>I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
>>started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.
>>
>>However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.
>>
>>As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
>>should savor such moments.
>
>So, do you have a Ruby app that parses each message number and examines it
>for extra numerical flavor?
No -- in this case I happened to notice because I was discussing
another message by number and noticed that it was slightly over
123456. In the old days it was easier since the numbers were in the
subjects
--
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Anders Engström aengstrom@gnejs.net
. http://www.gnejs.net PGP-Key: ED010E7F
. [Your mind is like an umbrella. It doesn't work unless you open it.]