Any bug/issue trackers written in Ruby?

Hi,

Are there any free bug/issue trackers written in Ruby?

For comparison, Python has at least two really nice ones (trac and roundup):

http://www.edgewall.com/trac/
http://roundup.sourceforge.net/

Even rubyonrails is using an issue-tracker written in Python (trac).
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/trac.cgi/wiki

Not yet as far as I know. I do plan on creating a Ruby port of Bug
Traction when I have more time, but at this moment, I simply don't
have the time to work on it. I will seriously be looking at the
available application frameworks when I do so (mostly for the
database layer, as I'm reasonably happy with the presentation layer
that I have for Ruwiki).

-austin

···

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:37:21 +0900, J. D. <jd@nospam.com> wrote:

Are there any free bug/issue trackers written in Ruby?

For comparison, Python has at least two really nice ones (trac and
roundup):

Edgewall Software: Trac
http://roundup.sourceforge.net/

Even rubyonrails is using an issue-tracker written in Python (trac).
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/trac.cgi/wiki

--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca

I've been working on bug tracking system for sometime. This is the URL of the demo version: http://bugtrack.homeunix.net. If you are interested, I can prepare the tar of the current source code.

Cheers,
Kent.

···

On Dec 12, 2004, at 1:37 PM, J. D. wrote:

Hi,

Are there any free bug/issue trackers written in Ruby?

For comparison, Python has at least two really nice ones (trac and roundup):

Edgewall Software: Trac
http://roundup.sourceforge.net/

Even rubyonrails is using an issue-tracker written in Python (trac).
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/trac.cgi/wiki

Hi,

···

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:37:21 +0900, J. D. <jd@nospam.com> wrote:

Hi,

Are there any free bug/issue trackers written in Ruby?

For comparison, Python has at least two really nice ones (trac and roundup):

Edgewall Software: Trac
http://roundup.sourceforge.net/

Even rubyonrails is using an issue-tracker written in Python (trac).
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/trac.cgi/wiki

I know a web-based bug tracking system named "Kagemai".

- http://sourceforge.jp/projects/kagemai/
- http://www.daifukuya.com/kagemai/ (Japanese)

But all documents are written in Japanese.

--
yyuu <subterranean.homesick@gmail.com>
RemDebuggerWiki -> http://www.mind.sccs.chukyo-u.ac.jp/~yyuu/rem/

Very nice! I understood the entire application without needing to
think, and everything nicely laid out.

A few glitches here and there, but mostly very smooth and functional.

Do you plan on putting it up into RubyForge?

Regards,
Nick

···

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:17:58 +0900, Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@bellsouth.net> wrote:

I've been working on bug tracking system for sometime. This is the URL
of the demo version: http://bugtrack.homeunix.net. If you are
interested, I can prepare the tar of the current source code.

Cheers,
Kent.

Thanks. There are definitely a lot of things missing but I spent only two week of doing it. I probably should create a project on RubyForge. The only thing that I'm waiting for right now is for DHH to put up a new version of Rails 0.9. So I can upgrade it and use some of those shiny new features. :slight_smile:

Cheers,
Kent.

···

On Dec 13, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Nicholas Van Weerdenburg wrote:

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:17:58 +0900, Kent Sibilev > <ksibilev@bellsouth.net> wrote:

I've been working on bug tracking system for sometime. This is the URL
of the demo version: http://bugtrack.homeunix.net. If you are
interested, I can prepare the tar of the current source code.

Cheers,
Kent.

Very nice! I understood the entire application without needing to
think, and everything nicely laid out.

A few glitches here and there, but mostly very smooth and functional.

Do you plan on putting it up into RubyForge?

Regards,
Nick

Hi --

I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.

However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.

As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
should savor such moments.

David

···

--
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net

"David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

Hi --

I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.

However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.

As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
should savor such moments.

Well, there will be some lovely moments in another 148,372 and 190,703
messages (after #123456).

···

--
Lloyd Zusman
ljz@asfast.com
God bless you.

David A. Black wrote:

Hi --

I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.

However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.

As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
should savor such moments.

So, do you have a Ruby app that parses each message number and examines it for extra numerical flavor?

James

Hi --

···

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, James Britt wrote:

David A. Black wrote:

Hi --

I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.

However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.

As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
should savor such moments.

So, do you have a Ruby app that parses each message number and examines it for extra numerical flavor?

No -- in this case I happened to notice because I was discussing
another message by number and noticed that it was slightly over
123456. In the old days it was easier since the numbers were in the
subjects :slight_smile:

David

--
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net

Lloyd Zusman ha scritto:

"David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

Hi --

I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.

However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.

As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
should savor such moments.

Well, there will be some lovely moments in another 148,372 and 190,703
messages (after #123456).

well, Im waiting for 131.072 and 150.000. Worth noting that ruby-core is approaching 4000, get the jackpot by sending patrches for the open bugs :wink:

For your enjoyment:

(.muttrc)

    ignore *
    unignore from: date subject to cc
    unignore organization organisation x-mailer: x-newsreader:
    x-mailing-list:
    unignore posted-to:
    unignore X-Bogosity:
    unignore X-Mail-Count:
              ^---- that's it.

:slight_smile:

//Anders

···

On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:45:04PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:

Hi --

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, James Britt wrote:

>David A. Black wrote:
>>Hi --
>>
>>I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
>>started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.
>>
>>However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.
>>
>>As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
>>should savor such moments.
>
>So, do you have a Ruby app that parses each message number and examines it
>for extra numerical flavor?

No -- in this case I happened to notice because I was discussing
another message by number and noticed that it was slightly over
123456. In the old days it was easier since the numbers were in the
subjects :slight_smile:

--
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Anders Engström aengstrom@gnejs.net
. http://www.gnejs.net PGP-Key: ED010E7F
. [Your mind is like an umbrella. It doesn't work unless you open it.]