Thanks for the new release! Ruby is a wonderful language.
The zip file above, with a link on the front page of http://www.ruby-lang.org, is actually linked to the tar.gz file. Just
wanted to let you guys know.
Also, the 1.9.0 Windows binary is here: ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/unstable/ruby-1.9.0-0-i386-mswin32.zip
Not here: ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/ruby-1.9.0-20070709-i386-mswin32.zip
This is great news. Thanks all for your effort and work!
···
On Dec 25, 2007 10:07 AM, James Herdman <james.herdman@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you to Matz and the many Ruby contributors! Your efforts are
very much appreciated. Thank you so very much for help to make
programming something I love to do.
James
On Dec 25, 2007 10:04 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are happy to announce of the release of the 1.9.0 the development
> release. You can fetch it from:
>
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-0.tar.bz2
> 407cc7d0032e19eb12216c0ebc7f17b3
>
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-0.tar.gz
> b20cce98b284f7f75939c09d5c8e846d
>
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-0.zip
> 78b2a5f9a81c5f6775002c4fb24d2d75
>
> We hope this helps you to enjoy hacking. Happy Holidays.
>
> matz.
>
>
As stated at rubyconf and elsewhere, this is a development release. It is not as solid as 1.8 currently is.
It is probably not a good idea to roll out a "dot zero" of _anything_ into production (eg, I'll NEVER roll out a dot zero (or for that matter, a dot one) of rails to my production envs).
···
On Dec 25, 2007, at 11:40 , Ken Bloom wrote:
We are happy to announce of the release of the 1.9.0 the development
release. You can fetch it from: [...]
Is this a stable release? Is it intended for production development
like 1.8 was?
Thankfully, you don't have long to wait after a dot zero Rails release
to get something else.
···
On Dec 25, 3:25 pm, Ryan Davis <ryand-r...@zenspider.com> wrote:
It is probably not a good idea to roll out a "dot zero" of _anything_
into production (eg, I'll NEVER roll out a dot zero (or for that
matter, a dot one) of rails to my production envs).
>> We are happy to announce of the release of the 1.9.0 the development
>> release. You can fetch it from: [...]
> Is this a stable release? Is it intended for production development
> like 1.8 was?
"the development release"
As stated at rubyconf and elsewhere, this is a development release. It
is not as solid as 1.8 currently is.
It is probably not a good idea to roll out a "dot zero" of _anything_
into production (eg, I'll NEVER roll out a dot zero (or for that
matter, a dot one) of rails to my production envs).
···
On Dec 25, 2007 9:25 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
--Jeremy
···
On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> writes:
>Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.
We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
of work on 1.9:
* preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
doc/NEWS.
* some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.
* migration path (and tools) from 1.8.
* document, document, document.
But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.
On Dec 25, 2007 10:08 PM, Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote:
Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
--Jeremy
On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> > writes:
>
> >Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.
>
> We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
> of work on 1.9:
>
> * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
> doc/NEWS.
>
> * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.
>
> * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.
>
> * document, document, document.
>
> But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
> Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.
>
> matz.
>
>
>
In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:08:21 +0900, "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> writes:
Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
How about updating doc/NEWS file, and sending patches to
<ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list? Or we can set up Wiki pages for
cooperate documentation writing.
hi, I'm a little confused. If it is released now, what is the one on
Synaptic list in Ubuntu 7.10?
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0+20070830-2ubuntu1
Could anyone give an explanation?
Thank you.
ning
···
2007/12/26, Shawn Anderson <shawn42@gmail.com>:
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
/Shawn
On Dec 25, 2007 10:08 PM, Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> > wrote:
> Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
> I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
> haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
>
> --Jeremy
>
> On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > > > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> > > writes:
> >
> > >Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.
> >
> > We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
> > of work on 1.9:
> >
> > * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
> > doc/NEWS.
> >
> > * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.
> >
> > * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.
> >
> > * document, document, document.
> >
> > But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
> > Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.
> >
> > matz.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.jeremymcanally.com/
>
> My books:
> Ruby in Practice
> Ruby in Practice
>
> My free Ruby e-book
> http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/
>
> My blogs:
> http://www.mrneighborly.com/
> http://www.rubyinpractice.com/
>
>
On 26/12/2007, Shawn Anderson <shawn42@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
/Shawn
On Dec 25, 2007 10:08 PM, Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> > wrote:
> Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
> I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
> haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
>
> --Jeremy
>
> On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > > > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> > > writes:
> >
> > >Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.
> >
> > We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
> > of work on 1.9:
> >
> > * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
> > doc/NEWS.
> >
> > * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.
> >
> > * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.
> >
> > * document, document, document.
> >
> > But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
> > Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.
> >
> > matz.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.jeremymcanally.com/
>
> My books:
> Ruby in Practice
> Ruby in Practice
>
> My free Ruby e-book
> http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/
>
> My blogs:
> http://www.mrneighborly.com/
> http://www.rubyinpractice.com/
>
>
On 12/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:08:21 +0900, "Jeremy McAnally" > <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> writes:
>
>Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
> I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
>haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
How about updating doc/NEWS file, and sending patches to
<ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list? Or we can set up Wiki pages for
cooperate documentation writing.