[ANN] Ruby 1.9.0 is released

This alone makes today worth it :slight_smile:

···

On Dec 25, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

Hi,

For your information, here's the test result from the released Ruby
1.9.0:

  sample/test.rb
  858 tests 0 failed

  bootstraptest/
  821 tests 0 failed

  test/ruby/test_*.rb
  849 tests 1935064 assertions 1 failures 0 errors

  test-all
  3263 tests 2275950 assertions 8 failures 6 errors

We couldn't make it error free, but it's fairly good, we hope.

              matz.

Brad Tilley wrote:

Thanks for the new release! Ruby is a wonderful language.

The zip file above, with a link on the front page of
http://www.ruby-lang.org, is actually linked to the tar.gz file. Just
wanted to let you guys know.

Also, the 1.9.0 Windows binary is here:
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/unstable/ruby-1.9.0-0-i386-mswin32.zip

Not here:
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/ruby-1.9.0-20070709-i386-mswin32.zip

This is mis-linked here:
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.

This is great news. Thanks all for your effort and work!

···

On Dec 25, 2007 10:07 AM, James Herdman <james.herdman@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you to Matz and the many Ruby contributors! Your efforts are
very much appreciated. Thank you so very much for help to make
programming something I love to do.

James

On Dec 25, 2007 10:04 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are happy to announce of the release of the 1.9.0 the development
> release. You can fetch it from:
>
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-0.tar.bz2
> 407cc7d0032e19eb12216c0ebc7f17b3
>
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-0.tar.gz
> b20cce98b284f7f75939c09d5c8e846d
>
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-0.zip
> 78b2a5f9a81c5f6775002c4fb24d2d75
>
> We hope this helps you to enjoy hacking. Happy Holidays.
>
> matz.
>
>

--
EPA Rating: 3000 Lines of Code / Gallon (of coffee)

"the development release"

As stated at rubyconf and elsewhere, this is a development release. It is not as solid as 1.8 currently is.

It is probably not a good idea to roll out a "dot zero" of _anything_ into production (eg, I'll NEVER roll out a dot zero (or for that matter, a dot one) of rails to my production envs).

···

On Dec 25, 2007, at 11:40 , Ken Bloom wrote:

We are happy to announce of the release of the 1.9.0 the development
release. You can fetch it from: [...]

Is this a stable release? Is it intended for production development
like 1.8 was?

Quoth Magicloud Wang:

May I know where I could get a major changelog?

Thanks.

http://eigenclass.org/hiki/Changes+in+Ruby+1.9

HTH,

···

--
Konrad Meyer <konrad@tylerc.org> http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/

Hi,

Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.

We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
of work on 1.9:

  * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
    doc/NEWS.

  * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.

  * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.

  * document, document, document.

But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.

              matz.

···

In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> writes:

Thanks Matz!

Best regards,

- --
Eustáquio "TaQ" Rangel
http://eustaquiorangel.com

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
A. Einstein

Thanks :slight_smile:

···

On 12/25/07, thefed <fedzor@gmail.com> wrote:

On Dec 25, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> For your information, here's the test result from the released Ruby
> 1.9.0:
>
> sample/test.rb
> 858 tests 0 failed
>
> bootstraptest/
> 821 tests 0 failed
>
> test/ruby/test_*.rb
> 849 tests 1935064 assertions 1 failures 0 errors
>
> test-all
> 3263 tests 2275950 assertions 8 failures 6 errors
>
> We couldn't make it error free, but it's fairly good, we hope.
>
>
> matz.

This alone makes today worth it :slight_smile:

--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yours,
Waleed Harbi
Nothing without reason everything for something.

Thankfully, you don't have long to wait after a dot zero Rails release
to get something else.

···

On Dec 25, 3:25 pm, Ryan Davis <ryand-r...@zenspider.com> wrote:

It is probably not a good idea to roll out a "dot zero" of _anything_
into production (eg, I'll NEVER roll out a dot zero (or for that
matter, a dot one) of rails to my production envs).

--
-yossef

>> We are happy to announce of the release of the 1.9.0 the development
>> release. You can fetch it from: [...]

> Is this a stable release? Is it intended for production development
> like 1.8 was?

"the development release"

As stated at rubyconf and elsewhere, this is a development release. It
is not as solid as 1.8 currently is.

It is probably not a good idea to roll out a "dot zero" of _anything_
into production (eg, I'll NEVER roll out a dot zero (or for that
matter, a dot one) of rails to my production envs).

···

On Dec 25, 2007 9:25 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

On Dec 25, 2007, at 11:40 , Ken Bloom wrote:

But let us rest for a while.

You have earned it Matz! Thank you so very much for your fun language!

We welcome volunteers.
Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.

Good idea! I will.

Regards

Mikel

···

On Dec 26, 2007 12:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.

--Jeremy

···

On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

Hi,

In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> writes:

>Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.

We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
of work on 1.9:

  * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
    doc/NEWS.

  * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.

  * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.

  * document, document, document.

But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.

                                                        matz.

--
http://www.jeremymcanally.com/

My books:
Ruby in Practice

My free Ruby e-book

My blogs:

http://www.rubyinpractice.com/

Count me in :slight_smile:

···

On Dec 26, 2:44 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto <m...@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

Hi,

In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwo...@gmail.com> writes:

>Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.

We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
of work on 1.9:

  * preparing more detaileCount me ind document of 1.9 changes than the current
    doc/NEWS.

  * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.

  * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.

  * document, document, document.

But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
Join <ruby-c...@ruby-lang.org> list.

                                                        matz.

Thanks Matz! From Brazil, like Akita said...

···

--
Bernardo Rufino

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

/Shawn

···

On Dec 25, 2007 10:08 PM, Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote:

Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.

--Jeremy

On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> > writes:
>
> >Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.
>
> We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
> of work on 1.9:
>
> * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
> doc/NEWS.
>
> * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.
>
> * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.
>
> * document, document, document.
>
> But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
> Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.
>
> matz.
>
>
>

--
http://www.jeremymcanally.com/

My books:
Ruby in Practice
Ruby in Practice

My free Ruby e-book
http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/

My blogs:
http://www.mrneighborly.com/
http://www.rubyinpractice.com/

Thanks Matz from Argentina, I know happy friends with Ruby. :wink:

http://rubyargentina.soveran.com/

···

_______________________________________________
http://www.sindominio.net/ayuda/preguntas-inteligentes.html
http://cronopios.net/Traducciones/trolls.es.html

Mi blog:

:-{þ

Hi,

···

In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:08:21 +0900, "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> writes:

Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.

How about updating doc/NEWS file, and sending patches to
<ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list? Or we can set up Wiki pages for
cooperate documentation writing.

              matz.

hi, I'm a little confused. If it is released now, what is the one on
Synaptic list in Ubuntu 7.10?
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0+20070830-2ubuntu1

Could anyone give an explanation?
Thank you.

ning

···

2007/12/26, Shawn Anderson <shawn42@gmail.com>:

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

/Shawn

On Dec 25, 2007 10:08 PM, Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> > wrote:

> Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
> I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
> haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
>
> --Jeremy
>
> On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > > > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> > > writes:
> >
> > >Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.
> >
> > We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
> > of work on 1.9:
> >
> > * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
> > doc/NEWS.
> >
> > * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.
> >
> > * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.
> >
> > * document, document, document.
> >
> > But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
> > Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.
> >
> > matz.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.jeremymcanally.com/
>
> My books:
> Ruby in Practice
> Ruby in Practice
>
> My free Ruby e-book
> http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/
>
> My blogs:
> http://www.mrneighborly.com/
> http://www.rubyinpractice.com/
>
>

Cool Ruby new version :slight_smile:

···

On 26/12/2007, Shawn Anderson <shawn42@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

/Shawn

On Dec 25, 2007 10:08 PM, Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> > wrote:

> Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
> I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
> haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
>
> --Jeremy
>
> On Dec 25, 2007 8:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > > > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:52:21 +0900, Rk Ch <rollingwoods@gmail.com> > > writes:
> >
> > >Great christmas gift! Thanks for guys hard worked.
> >
> > We worked hard. But it's just a beginning. We still need to do a lot
> > of work on 1.9:
> >
> > * preparing more detailed document of 1.9 changes than the current
> > doc/NEWS.
> >
> > * some gems for obsolete and lost libraries, e.g. base64.
> >
> > * migration path (and tools) from 1.8.
> >
> > * document, document, document.
> >
> > But let us rest for a while. We welcome volunteers.
> > Join <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list.
> >
> > matz.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.jeremymcanally.com/
>
> My books:
> Ruby in Practice
> Ruby in Practice
>
> My free Ruby e-book
> http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/
>
> My blogs:
> http://www.mrneighborly.com/
> http://www.rubyinpractice.com/
>
>

--
Arun Agrawal

Sent from BlackBerry(R) on Hutch

It's greet if can use Wiki pages.

--Philo

···

On 12/26/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

Hi,

In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released" > on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:08:21 +0900, "Jeremy McAnally" > <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> writes:
>
>Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
> I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
>haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.

How about updating doc/NEWS file, and sending patches to
<ruby-core@ruby-lang.org> list? Or we can set up Wiki pages for
cooperate documentation writing.

              matz.

--
Your True Friend.
Philo Cai