This is a release candidate of Ruby 1.9.1, which will be the first
stable version of Ruby 1.9 series. Try it early and have a experience of
modern, faster, with clearer syntax, multilingualized and much improved
Ruby world.
It's the 21st century, IP address shortage, NAT, ..
Thanks
···
On 30/12/2008, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:
Hi, folks
Ruby 1.9.1 has been just released.
This is a release candidate of Ruby 1.9.1, which will be the first
stable version of Ruby 1.9 series. Try it early and have a experience of
modern, faster, with clearer syntax, multilingualized and much improved
Ruby world.
This is a release candidate of Ruby 1.9.1, which will be the first
stable version of Ruby 1.9 series. Try it early and have a experience of
modern, faster, with clearer syntax, multilingualized and much improved
Ruby world.
On 30 dic, 13:00, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 30/12/2008, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
> Hi, folks
> Ruby 1.9.1 has been just released.
> This is a release candidate of Ruby 1.9.1, which will be the first
> stable version of Ruby 1.9 series. Try it early and have a experience of
> modern, faster, with clearer syntax, multilingualized and much improved
> Ruby world.
Any reason why this is throttled to 2K/sec ? At this rate the next
version will be out before my download completes.
I got that beat. I am right now compiling it thru Windows Vista onto a 1 Gig Flash drive, for the hell of it. I expect the next version to be out before my tar xfj completes! (-:
(BTW I'm also actually using it, remotely on a Linux server, and it works fine so far...)
Any reason why this is throttled to 2K/sec ? At this rate the next
version will be out before my download completes.
I got that beat. I am right now compiling it thru Windows Vista onto a 1 Gig Flash drive, for the hell of it. I expect the next version to be out before my tar xfj completes! (-:
(BTW I'm also actually using it, remotely on a Linux server, and it works fine so far...)
Just wondering if there are Windows binaries yet. Is this compiled on Windows using MinGW or VC++ 6?
I checked the FTP directories on ruby-lang: ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/unstable/ ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mingw/1.9/ ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/djgpp/1.9/
...and all don't have it yet.
Builds with MinGW are coming, still several things to iron on the
build process for both 1.8.6 and 1.9.1, will do a proper announcement
when crack that down.
···
On Dec 31, 12:21 am, Mohit Sindhwani <mo_m...@onghu.com> wrote:
Phlip wrote:
> Greg Donald wrote:
>> Any reason why this is throttled to 2K/sec ? At this rate the next
>> version will be out before my download completes.
> I got that beat. I am right now compiling it thru Windows Vista onto a
> 1 Gig Flash drive, for the hell of it. I expect the next version to be
> out before my tar xfj completes! (-:
> (BTW I'm also actually using it, remotely on a Linux server, and it
> works fine so far...)
Just wondering if there are Windows binaries yet. Is this compiled on
Windows using MinGW or VC++ 6?
I checked the FTP directories on ruby-lang:ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/unstable/ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mingw/1.9/ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/djgpp/1.9/
..and all don't have it yet.