[ANN] Potential Brit ruby meeting formally Chunky Bacon

Getting a good group now!

The next questions are: when where and how?!

There seem to be a few communities on the go in the UK already. Might be
worth having our own Brit Ruby Conference, like the US version but with
rain rather than snow!

This could go into a lot of discussion....

Gem

···

-----Original Message-----
From: Paolo Negri [mailto:hungrylist@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 October 2006 00:08
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: [ANN] Potential Brit ruby meeting formally Chunky Bacon

               *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an
external partner or the Global Internet.
     Keep this in mind if you answer this message.

On 25/10/06, Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:15:12AM +0900, Alec Ross wrote:
> In message <C4E42C77B75F724FAE57FA9A5319563806592F53@glkms0012>, > > "Cameron, Gemma (UK)" <Gemma.Cameron@baesystems.com> writes
> >
> >
> >Head count for who'd be up for a meeting and where you currently
> >hang your hat please:

> Alec - London/Kent

Thomas - Southampton/Hampshire.

-- Thomas Adam

Paolo - Swindon/Wiltshire

Thanks

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

Britain tends to end up as part of the European Ruby scene right now
(which is no bad thing). Euruko is next weekend in Germany, and is
dirt cheap (and might still be taking places if you fancy a jaunt
east); RailsConf Europe was in London six/seven weeks ago (but
RailsConf Europe 2007 will be in Germany).

Just to point out that there _is_ stuff happening _already_ in this country.

···

On 26/10/06, Cameron, Gemma (UK) <Gemma.Cameron@baesystems.com> wrote:

There seem to be a few communities on the go in the UK already. Might be
worth having our own Brit Ruby Conference, like the US version but with
rain rather than snow!

Getting a good group now!

Well, half a dozen or so, at least.

The next questions are: when where and how?!

Make it UnConf-style (i.e. no programme, everybody turning up should be able to do a session), somewhere cheap and central (my vote goes for Manchester).

There seem to be a few communities on the go in the UK already. Might be
worth having our own Brit Ruby Conference, like the US version but with
rain rather than snow!

And less money required to attend.

This could go into a lot of discussion....

Let's bikeshed[*] it to death quickly and then get on with it then. I reckon next spring is possible without too much effort.

[*] - Frequently Asked Questions for FreeBSD | FreeBSD Documentation Portal

···

On 26 Oct 2006, at 15:44, Cameron, Gemma (UK) wrote:

Cameron, Gemma (UK) wrote:

Getting a good group now!

The next questions are: when where and how?!

There seem to be a few communities on the go in the UK already. Might be
worth having our own Brit Ruby Conference, like the US version but with
rain rather than snow!

This could go into a lot of discussion....

I suggest you all join me in Munich for Euruko 2006
next week... the UK and Germany aren't all that far
apart... :wink:

Hal

···

Gem

-----Original Message-----
From: Paolo Negri [mailto:hungrylist@gmail.com] Sent: 26 October 2006 00:08
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: [ANN] Potential Brit ruby meeting formally Chunky Bacon

               *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an
external partner or the Global Internet. Keep this in mind if you answer this message.

On 25/10/06, Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:15:12AM +0900, Alec Ross wrote:

In message <C4E42C77B75F724FAE57FA9A5319563806592F53@glkms0012>, >>>"Cameron, Gemma (UK)" <Gemma.Cameron@baesystems.com> writes

Head count for who'd be up for a meeting and where you currently hang your hat please:

Alec - London/Kent

Thomas - Southampton/Hampshire.

-- Thomas Adam

Paolo - Swindon/Wiltshire

Thanks

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

There's no real reason that the UK should be tacked on to Europe, community-wise, and improving the local community has to be a *good* thing, not a bad one.

The London Ruby group seems to be very much a stealth group. If newcomers to the community aren't aware of it (and it took me more than 6 months before I heard about it), then there's room for a more public forum. RailsConf, on the other hand, was reasonably well publicised.

Paul

···

On 26 Oct 2006, at 16:49, Tom Armitage wrote:

On 26/10/06, Cameron, Gemma (UK) <Gemma.Cameron@baesystems.com> wrote:

There seem to be a few communities on the go in the UK already. Might be
worth having our own Brit Ruby Conference, like the US version but with
rain rather than snow!

Britain tends to end up as part of the European Ruby scene right now
(which is no bad thing). Euruko is next weekend in Germany, and is
dirt cheap (and might still be taking places if you fancy a jaunt
east); RailsConf Europe was in London six/seven weeks ago (but
RailsConf Europe 2007 will be in Germany).

Just to point out that there _is_ stuff happening _already_ in this country.

It's no bad thing, but it's no great thing either - I can't do
international travel anywhere nearly as easily as I can travel within
the UK, and RailsConf doesn't really float my boat, being a
mostly-non-railser. It would be really cool to have something (probably
more informal than Rubyconf) here in the UK.

My vote would be for either Nottingham or Manchester, not only because
they're fairly central, but also because I'm pretty much already
there :->

···

On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:49 +0900, Tom Armitage wrote:

On 26/10/06, Cameron, Gemma (UK) <Gemma.Cameron@baesystems.com> wrote:

> There seem to be a few communities on the go in the UK already. Might be
> worth having our own Brit Ruby Conference, like the US version but with
> rain rather than snow!

Britain tends to end up as part of the European Ruby scene right now
(which is no bad thing). Euruko is next weekend in Germany, and is
dirt cheap (and might still be taking places if you fancy a jaunt
east); RailsConf Europe was in London six/seven weeks ago (but
RailsConf Europe 2007 will be in Germany).

Just to point out that there _is_ stuff happening _already_ in this country.

--
Ross Bamford - rosco@roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk

There's no real reason that the UK should be tacked on to Europe,
community-wise, and improving the local community has to be a *good*
thing, not a bad one.

No, I know there's no "real" reason, apart from _numbers_, which is
why it's sometimes more feasible to band together into a large enough
number.

The London Ruby group seems to be very much a stealth group. If
newcomers to the community aren't aware of it (and it took me more
than 6 months before I heard about it), then there's room for a more
public forum. RailsConf, on the other hand, was reasonably well
publicised.

Well, the London Ruby Group is only of relevance to people in/near
London, TBH. It's very much _not_ a stealth group, though; it mentions
its existence here and it has very vocal members of the community. It
also has a few _long-standing_ members of the Ruby community within
it. They are very much not stealth, either.

I'm just trying to point out that the best course of action as a
newbie is not to go "hey, let's have a conference, who here does
Ruby?" but rather to poke around for larger organisations such as
Geekup, LRUG, etc, who might be able to offer
advice/expertise/contacts/resources to make a really kickass
conference, rather than just a bunch of people loosely throwing things
together.

(For instance: LRUG has a very good relationship with Skillsmatter,
who ran the events side of things at RailsconfEurope (along with
RubyCentral) and offer us a room each month. They're nice, and they
have good facilities).

This does not mean such an event can't be thrown together quickly and
affordably and without hassle, it's just prudent to look for peers
rather than assume you're the only people interested in doing stuff.

It's not a case of raining on parades or treading on toes. It's just
advice, and it's frustrating people charging into things.

t.

···

On 26/10/06, Paul Lynch <paul@plsys.co.uk> wrote:

The London Ruby group seems to be very much a stealth group. If
newcomers to the community aren't aware of it (and it took me more
than 6 months before I heard about it), then there's room for a more
public forum. RailsConf, on the other hand, was reasonably well
publicised.

Well, the London Ruby Group is only of relevance to people in/near
London, TBH. It's very much _not_ a stealth group, though; it mentions
its existence here and it has very vocal members of the community. It
also has a few _long-standing_ members of the Ruby community within
it. They are very much not stealth, either.

Let's just say that LRUG doesn't advertise its existence on this list. I didn't remember any posts, apart from a parenthetical mention relating to RailsConf last month, which might have been on the Rails list - and a search showed the most recent announcement was in November 2005. Take that as a hint that this could be improved.

it's just prudent to look for peers rather than assume you're the only people interested in doing stuff.

I thought that's what they were doing; one has to start somewhere.

It's not a case of raining on parades or treading on toes. It's just
advice, and it's frustrating people charging into things.

OK, it just came across to me that way.

Paul

···

On 26 Oct 2006, at 17:53, Tom Armitage wrote:

On 26/10/06, Paul Lynch <paul@plsys.co.uk> wrote:

I'm just trying to point out that the best course of action as a
newbie is not to go "hey, let's have a conference, who here does
Ruby?" but rather to poke around for larger organisations such as
Geekup, LRUG, etc, who might be able to offer
advice/expertise/contacts/resources to make a really kickass
conference, rather than just a bunch of people loosely throwing things
together.

Tom, you completely miss the point. What's more, you're kind of being a bit rude whilst you do it. Please take the rest of this mail in the gentle spirit in which it is intended.

The simple truth is, meetings in the UK aren't easy for newbs to find. There aren't very many meetings anyway. What meetings there are, don't appeal to 80% of the community - they feel very 'cliquey' and 'elitist' to newbies. You certainly aren't doing much here to betray the opinion that they might not be very newbie-friendly. You make the community come across as almost hostile.

And anyway, an over-priced Rails conference six weeks ago is not the same as a cheap Ruby meeting next year. A meeting in Germany is not a UK meeting. An LRUG is not the same as a UK meeting.

She wanted a cheap UK Ruby meeting.

There isn't one.

She offered to sort it out for us.

You told her off.

You suck. :slight_smile:

If LRUG wants to offer a UK meeting, they should, but they're not, so if Gemma wants to, why should anybody get in her way? I feel that you're belittling and patronising somebody who is trying to bring us together as a community.

I don't care if she's a newbie. She was trying to do something for the good of us all. Telling her off doesn't help us, her, or you. It just makes you - and the rest of us who have been knocking around for a while - look mean.

This does not mean such an event can't be thrown together quickly and
affordably and without hassle, it's just prudent to look for peers
rather than assume you're the only people interested in doing stuff.

Look at the list of people on this thread who said "I'm in", and ask yourself why they aren't attending LRUG or Euroko.

I have no doubt LRUG is good at what it does. I have no doubt GeekUp is good at what it does. Had you thought maybe there is room for something different? Something fresh and new that might be to the benefit of us all?

There are no formal communication channels within the Ruby community, outside of Matz accepting changes to the language.

There is no need to look for peers for approval.

If somebody wants to do something, they get to do it, and they deserve our unequivocal support for *trying*.

If nobody shows up, well, hey-ho. C'est la vie.

They should never, EVER feel they have to ask you or anybody else for what feels like 'permission'.

You effectively *chastised* her for fuck's sake.

I'm sad about that. Really, really sad. And angry. :frowning:

It's not a case of raining on parades or treading on toes. It's just
advice, and it's frustrating people charging into things.

It's even more frustrating when I see mean people patronising a newb who is so enthusiastic, she wants to do something that benefits all of us.

Now she won't feel she can. A whole new opportunity for us all has been lost because you decided to vent.

It's easy to say "No, don't, because this thing exists and you should like it, god damn you", and much harder to say "sure, this thing is here, that thing is there, they might help, but if you want to do something else, we'll try and show up".

Do the hard thing Tom, and stop saying things that make you sound like a jerk.

I know you're not a jerk, but you kind of sound like one, here.

Kind of. In a way. But not horrendously so.

It's like this is trying to be the Perl or PHP community. We don't want it to be like that. Please let us get on with having fun.

I hope you don't feel like I'm being horrible, but it had to be said, and nobody else was stepping up to the plate.

Gemma: go for it. I'll show up if I can. I'll help if I can. Other people will to. You don't need to ask for permission, or look at what already exists. People on this thread are saying yes, because they don't like what is already on offer. There is no clique, core, or group you have to ask permission of. Anybody who tells you there is, or pretends there is, isn't one of the rest of us. Don't listen.

@thread.responders.uniq.each { |possible_attendee|
   AddressBook << possible_attendee
   unless clique_members.include? possible_attendee
     possible_attendee.invite :possible_date => next_year
   end
}
@thread.close

Respect Tom, regardless, no hard feelings,

Paul

···

On 26 Oct 2006, at 17:53, Tom Armitage wrote:

Hi --

···

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Paul Lynch wrote:

On 26 Oct 2006, at 17:53, Tom Armitage wrote:

On 26/10/06, Paul Lynch <paul@plsys.co.uk> wrote:

The London Ruby group seems to be very much a stealth group. If
newcomers to the community aren't aware of it (and it took me more
than 6 months before I heard about it), then there's room for a more
public forum. RailsConf, on the other hand, was reasonably well
publicised.

Well, the London Ruby Group is only of relevance to people in/near
London, TBH. It's very much _not_ a stealth group, though; it mentions
its existence here and it has very vocal members of the community. It
also has a few _long-standing_ members of the Ruby community within
it. They are very much not stealth, either.

Let's just say that LRUG doesn't advertise its existence on this list.

I don't think most local/regional RUGs do. There's a wiki page for
them on Ruby Garden, though I don't think it's very up to date.

David

--
                   David A. Black | dblack@wobblini.net
Author of "Ruby for Rails" [1] | Ruby/Rails training & consultancy [3]
DABlog (DAB's Weblog) [2] | Co-director, Ruby Central, Inc. [4]
[1] Ruby for Rails | [3] http://www.rubypowerandlight.com
[2] http://dablog.rubypal.com | [4] http://www.rubycentral.org

The one I maintain there is. The problem with any regional group
gathering with a special interest to it, such as Ruby, is that for some
areas there are not many people at all. This is something that I am
experiencing at the moment where I happen to live in the UK. I have
had to date only one person contact me with a specific interest in
starting a RUG. But he hasn't replied back to me in over five months.

What tends to happen (and is much more likely) is that interest in a
particular aspect of programming stems from more generalised meetings
such as LUGs -- but the problem then is maintaining interest. I have
seen a few people express an interest in $FOO with a verbal intent of
carrying it forward only to have them back out for no other reason
other than a loss of interest; which is paradoxically annoying.

So I am but a lone Ruby programmer. I might look at joining the London
group but London is many miles from where I happen to live.

-- Thomas Adam

···

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:39:48 +0900 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

I don't think most local/regional RUGs do. There's a wiki page for
them on Ruby Garden, though I don't think it's very up to date.

Paul, thanks for the feedback. As the main convenor of the London Ruby
User Group, I feel responsible if people in London aren't finding out
about us or don't find the meetings fun! I've posted next meeting's
details to ruby-talk:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/222246

All are welcome to come to meetings when in London! We are a friendly
bunch, and open to evolving in an agile manner. Based on this
ruby-talk thread, we've been debating on our lrug mailing list how to
be more friendly (http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org\).
We're going to put up links to our member's blogs from the LRUG site
to show our friendly faces - that'll be there next week.

We've being growing LRUG organically. The group started as a pub
meeting whenever David Black was passing through. Thanks to a great
bunch of local Rubyists and the enthusiasm of Tiest Villee when he got
back from RubyConf 2005, we started running monthly meetings with
presentions last year. More recently our group has benefited from our
friends Skills Matter (http://skillsmatter.com) donating meeting space
and event sponsorship. If you search for "ruby user group" or "london
ruby" we're on the first page of results, thanks to James Adam, who
set up our website (http://lrug.org). So hopefully we're not too hard
to find these days. :slight_smile:

cheers,
Rob McKinnon

···

On 10/27/06, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Paul Lynch wrote:
> On 26 Oct 2006, at 17:53, Tom Armitage wrote:
>> On 26/10/06, Paul Lynch <paul@plsys.co.uk> wrote:
>>> The London Ruby group seems to be very much a stealth group.
>>
>> Well, the London Ruby Group is only of relevance to people in/near
>> London, TBH. It's very much _not_ a stealth group, though
>
> Let's just say that LRUG doesn't advertise its existence on this list.

I don't think most local/regional RUGs do.

Hi --

I don't think most local/regional RUGs do. There's a wiki page for
them on Ruby Garden, though I don't think it's very up to date.

The one I maintain there is. The problem with any regional group
gathering with a special interest to it, such as Ruby, is that for some
areas there are not many people at all. This is something that I am
experiencing at the moment where I happen to live in the UK. I have
had to date only one person contact me with a specific interest in
starting a RUG. But he hasn't replied back to me in over five months.

I live between New York and Philadelphia, both of which have very
active Ruby and/or Rails groups. I've been to meetings of both and
they're great -- but I've also thought about having a New Jersey (my
state) group, and talked to some people about it. It's difficult,
because some people in NJ live as far from anywhere we'd meet as
others do from NY or Philly. I live just far enough from both to make
it non-easy to get to meetings.

What tends to happen (and is much more likely) is that interest in a
particular aspect of programming stems from more generalised meetings
such as LUGs -- but the problem then is maintaining interest. I have
seen a few people express an interest in $FOO with a verbal intent of
carrying it forward only to have them back out for no other reason
other than a loss of interest; which is paradoxically annoying.

So I am but a lone Ruby programmer. I might look at joining the London
group but London is many miles from where I happen to live.

-- Thomas Adam

Any relation to James? :slight_smile:

David

···

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Thomas Adam wrote:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:39:48 +0900 > dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

--
                   David A. Black | dblack@wobblini.net
Author of "Ruby for Rails" [1] | Ruby/Rails training & consultancy [3]
DABlog (DAB's Weblog) [2] | Co-director, Ruby Central, Inc. [4]
[1] Ruby for Rails | [3] http://www.rubypowerandlight.com
[2] http://dablog.rubypal.com | [4] http://www.rubycentral.org

I live between New York and Philadelphia, both of which have very
active Ruby and/or Rails groups. I've been to meetings of both and
they're great -- but I've also thought about having a New Jersey (my
state) group, and talked to some people about it. It's difficult,
because some people in NJ live as far from anywhere we'd meet as
others do from NY or Philly. I live just far enough from both to make
it non-easy to get to meetings.

Given the geography of America I can imagine how the distance might be
slightly more a hinderance, but then again, there's bound to be more
people in any one area which makes things like meetings worthwhile.
The demography here tends to be more sparse which makes things like
meetings on a smaller scale very difficult to maintain and/or start
unless there's a high enough interest already. :slight_smile:

Any relation to James? :slight_smile:

Hmm?

-- Thomas Adam

···

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:01:25 +0900 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

Hi --

···

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Thomas Adam wrote:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:01:25 +0900 > dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

Any relation to James? :slight_smile:

Hmm?

James Adam, a member and organizer of LRUG.

David

--
                   David A. Black | dblack@wobblini.net
Author of "Ruby for Rails" [1] | Ruby/Rails training & consultancy [3]
DABlog (DAB's Weblog) [2] | Co-director, Ruby Central, Inc. [4]
[1] Ruby for Rails | [3] http://www.rubypowerandlight.com
[2] http://dablog.rubypal.com | [4] http://www.rubycentral.org

Nope, no relation. :slight_smile: I do get called 'Adam Thomas' a lot, and I am
not related to him, either. :stuck_out_tongue: My parents had an odd sense of humour
giving me a name with two forenames essentially.

-- Thomas Adam

···

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:11:01 +0900 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

James Adam, a member and organizer of LRUG.

Ditto. It's a pain.

···

On 10/27/06, Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> wrote:

> James Adam, a member and organizer of LRUG.

Nope, no relation. :slight_smile: I do get called 'Adam Thomas' a lot, and I am
not related to him, either. :stuck_out_tongue: My parents had an odd sense of humour
giving me a name with two forenames essentially.

--
* J *
  ~

Parents. :~) One dear chap I saw on the train recently had his initials on his case. They were A.N.D.

···

In message <9ec5d0aa0610270702u5905f7aasc2aab5488996ad62@mail.gmail.com>, James Adam <james.adam@gmail.com> writes

On 10/27/06, Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> wrote:

> James Adam, a member and organizer of LRUG.

Nope, no relation. :slight_smile: I do get called 'Adam Thomas' a lot, and I am
not related to him, either. :stuck_out_tongue: My parents had an odd sense of humour
giving me a name with two forenames essentially.

Ditto. It's a pain.

--
Alec Ross