Lyle Johnson wrote:
···
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:54:46 +0900, Curt Hibbs <curt@hibbs.com> wrote:
The packaging scripts for creating the installer generally use binary
extensions, only building from source when there is no otherchoice. This
includes FXRuby, for which we use the FXRuby windows installer.
In reference to Austin's suggestion: Yes, I'm definitely still using
Visual C++ 6.0 to build FXRuby for Windows. What's the story with
Visual C++ 7.0 these days? Is the *optimized* version of the compiler
available for free? If so, and if someone can clue me in to a download
link for that version, I can probably switch over to the newer
compiler version.
Joao Pedrosa put together a set of links and instructions on RubyGarden (I
haven't tried them yet, myself):
http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?WindowsCompiler
Curt