InlineFortran version 1.0.0 has been released!
http://www.rubyforge.org/projects/rubyinline
== FEATURES/PROBLEMS:
* Very rudimentary right now. Needs some love.
== SYNOPSYS:
inline :Fortran do |builder|
builder.subroutine('print_integer', ["void", "int"], <<-END)
subroutine print_integer( integer )
integer, intent(in) :: integer
print *, 'integer: ', integer
end
END
end
== REQUIREMENTS:
Changes:
== 1.0.0 / 2006-10-21
* 1 major enhancement
* Birthday!
http://www.rubyforge.org/projects/rubyinline
And so we come full circle, 50 years of technological advancement have
allowed us to run FORTRAN! Again. I still can't decide whether to cheer
or groan 
However, impressive, as all of RubyInline. Which reminds me, I should
toy with it again to see if I can make it play along with directory
names with spaces like I meant to two years ago. (Or did this happen to
be fixed since?)
David Vallner
David Vallner wrote:
And so we come full circle, 50 years of technological advancement have
allowed us to run FORTRAN! Again. I still can't decide whether to cheer
or groan 
I haven't written any Fortran since 1990. I suppose it *would* come back to me. 50 years, eh? Well ... I wrote my first Fortran (II) programs almost that long ago. At least the machines *were* solid-state. 
So you *can* write Fortran programs in any language!
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Well ... I wrote my first Fortran (II) programs
almost that long ago. At least the machines *were* solid-state.
/me hides Edward's Zimmer frame, steals apples from his garden, and
stands on his lawn.
So you *can* write Fortran programs in any language!
Now it's decided. *groan*
David Vallner