Subject: Re: RubyInline 1.0.4 Released! (fwd)
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 02:00:57 +0900
From: William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@z.glue.umd.edu>
Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Organization: University of Maryland College Park
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
References:
<Pine.LNX.4.21.0209101712440.3470-100000@sanpietro.red-bean.com>
<alls6501s0h@enews3.newsguy.com> <slrnanubll.pu5.mike@ratdog.stok.co.uk>
<878z266op9.fsf@mycroft.homenet>Hmmmm, I think you basically have the right idea.
Now, how about Ruby::Inline::Python? Anyone dares to do that?
Cheers,
Bill
> I say Ruby::Inline is a great idea, and I hope it is extended to other
> languages. As a matter of fact, IIRC the original writer of
> Perl::Inline commented that having a Perl::Inline::Ruby module was a bit
> bass-ackward, since it made more sense to be able to include legacy
> Perl code in Ruby!
True. But from a refactoring standpoint, you could slowly replace Perl code
with Ruby until it all passes.
Cheers, Brian (the Inline guy)
ยทยทยท
On 13/09/02 12:09 -0700, Paul Prescod wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Avdi B. Grimm <avdi@avdi.org> wrote:
> ~Avdi