[ann] AEditor 0.10, folding added

Try out AEditor and tell me if AEditor works on your
machine. Please report if there is any problems.
Ideas + Suggestions for improvements is welcome :slight_smile:

http://raa.ruby-lang.org/list.rhtml?name=aeditor

The last few days I have been implementing folding into
AEditor. What is between ‘#[’ and ‘#]’ gets collapsed when
you press F8, like this:

class TestMisc < RUNIT::TestCase #[
def test_shift_until
ary = [1, 2, “a”, 3, 4, “b”, 5, 6]
res = ary.shift_until(String)
assert_equal([1, 2], res)
assert_equal([“a”, 3, 4, “b”, 5, 6], ary)
end
def test_shift_until_non_existing_class
ary = [1, 2, “a”, 3, 4, “b”, 5, 6]
res = ary.shift_until(IO)
assert_equal([], ary)
assert_equal([1, 2, “a”, 3, 4, “b”, 5, 6], res)
end
end #]

Then we press F8 and everything collapses into ONE line!

class TestMisc < RUNIT::TestCase [ 13 ]

···


Simon Strandgaard

No replies ?

Many people has downloaded AEditor, but only few has
replied/submitted bug reports/feature requests.

Who of you has tried AEditor ?

What do you think ?

BTW: Version 0.11 has been released today.

screenshots:
http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/shots.html

AEditor is an editor-widget intented to support pair-programming
as much as possible. Maybe this widget will be embedded into
FreeRide?

  • one Ruby-backend.
  • Multiple frontends (Ncurses, Qt).
···

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 19:49:51 +0200, Simon Strandgaard wrote:

Try out AEditor and tell me if AEditor works on your
machine. Please report if there is any problems.
Ideas + Suggestions for improvements is welcome :slight_smile:

http://raa.ruby-lang.org/list.rhtml?name=aeditor


Simon Strandgaard

Try out AEditor and tell me if AEditor works on your
machine. Please report if there is any problems.
Ideas + Suggestions for improvements is welcome :slight_smile:

http://raa.ruby-lang.org/list.rhtml?name=aeditor

No replies ?

Of course not. It’s an experience every open source programmer
will make. 45 Downloads of your previous release? That’s waaay
too less public interest for expecting any feedback. When you’ll
have some hundred downloads without getting any feedback, you
may start to worry :slight_smile:

Many people has downloaded AEditor, but only few has
replied/submitted bug reports/feature requests.

Who of you has tried AEditor ?

What do you think ?

I wanted to try it, but I got the following error:

…/aeditor/buffer_file.rb:2:in require': No such file to load -- fileutils (LoadError) from ./aeditor/buffer_file.rb:2 from ./aeditor/buffer.rb:6:in require’
from ./aeditor/buffer.rb:6
from ./aeditor/main.rb:3:in require' from ./aeditor/main.rb:3 from ../bin/aeditor:2:in require’
from …/bin/aeditor:2

Probably I should update to Ruby-1.8.0, because I’m currently using Ruby-1.6.7
which is the current version of Debian/Woody. Probably Ruby will be the
first package where I’ll try out Debian’s “package pinning”, but until now,
I’m just to lazy to do that :slight_smile:

screenshots:
http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/shots.html

AEditor is an editor-widget intented to support pair-programming
as much as possible.

According to the screenshots and to the FAQ, it seems to be a cool
editor :slight_smile:

Greets,

···

Simon Strandgaard 0bz63fz3m1qt3001@sneakemail.com wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 19:49:51 +0200, Simon Strandgaard wrote:


Volker Grabsch
—<<(())>>—
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times{\ell,\kappa\in\Re}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint!c_\hbar\right]}}}

No replies ?

Of course not. It’s an experience every open source programmer
will make. 45 Downloads of your previous release? That’s waaay
too less public interest for expecting any feedback. When you’ll
have some hundred downloads without getting any feedback, you
may start to worry :slight_smile:

Yes I have experienced that. Knowing that feeling too well, got
me started into submitting bug-reports/feature-requests to other
opensource projects. When I encounter a project which has relative
few bug-reports/feature-requests I submit a bunch of bug-reports.
When I encounter projects which already has too many (bloated)
I hesitate more with my bug-reports.

In the past AEditor were written in C++, there were extremely
few which downloaded it and almost zero replies!
After rewriting AEditor into Ruby, there is extremly many which
has downloaded it, but still almost zero replies. This I don’t
understand ?

Who of you has tried AEditor ?

I wanted to try it, but I got the following error:

Sorry, Ruby-1.6.7 is not sufficiently for AEditor.
The INSTALL file, says Ruby-1.8.0 is required, Read The Fine Manual (RTFM :slight_smile:

Maybe Ruby-SHIM will do it, I don’t know ?

Probably I should update to Ruby-1.8.0, because I’m currently using Ruby-1.6.7
which is the current version of Debian/Woody. Probably Ruby will be the
first package where I’ll try out Debian’s “package pinning”, but until now,
I’m just to lazy to do that :slight_smile:

I don’t know much about debian. Only tried ‘dselect’ a few times.
I can recommend ‘gnu-stow’, so that Ruby installs in the homedir.
http://www.gnu.org/software/stow/stow.html

screenshots:
http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/shots.html

AEditor is an editor-widget intented to support pair-programming
as much as possible.

According to the screenshots and to the FAQ, it seems to be a cool
editor :slight_smile:

Thanks. BTW: please critize AEditor, so that I know what to fix.

···

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:08:00 +0200, Volker Grabsch wrote:

Simon Strandgaard 0bz63fz3m1qt3001@sneakemail.com wrote:


Simon Strandgaard