This tutorial gives you complete knowledge starting from basic to
advance. It includes tutorial on Ruby Webservices, Ruby LDPA, Ruby XML,
Ruby/Tk, Ruby/DBI and many more interesting subjects.
If you like it please share it with others: I have put my lot of efforts
to put the things together and make it useful for all Ruby lovers.
Also, please send me your comments.
Thanks.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
[...]
Sorry, but what do you mean by "this"? 
Best regards,
Em Wednesday 04 June 2008, Mc Mohd escreveu:
This tutorial gives you complete knowledge starting from basic to
advance. It includes tutorial on Ruby Webservices, Ruby LDPA, Ruby XML,
Ruby/Tk, Ruby/DBI and many more interesting subjects.
--
Davi Vidal
--
E-mail: davividal@siscompar.com.br
MSN : davividal@msn.com
GTalk : davividal@gmail.com
Skype : davi vidal
YIM : davi_vidal
ICQ : 138815296
Sorry pal missed to send URL. Its here:
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/ruby/index.htm
Thanks.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Thanks for your work 
Good work!!
m.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Mc Mohd <mcmohd@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry pal missed to send URL. Its here:
This tutorial looks strangely familiar!
On 6/4/08, Oscar Del Ben <thehcdreamer@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for your work
--
[we need your code-fu] : www.zadic.co.za
And given the "required tools"
For performing the examples discussed in this tutorial, you will need a
Pentium 200-MHz computer with a minimum of 64 MB of RAM (128 MB of RAM
recommended). You also will need the following software:
- Linux 7.1 or Windows 95/98/2000/NT operating system
- Apache 1.3.19-5 Web server
- Internet Explorer 5.0 or above Web browser
- Ruby 1.6.6
Perhaps a bit old!?!
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Leslie Viljoen <leslieviljoen@gmail.com> wrote:
This tutorial looks strangely familiar!
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Yeah, plagiarism never gets old, does it? 
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Leslie Viljoen <leslieviljoen@gmail.com> wrote:
This tutorial looks strangely familiar!
Is this content copied from somewhere?
James Edward Gray II
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Lyle Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Leslie Viljoen <leslieviljoen@gmail.com > > wrote:
This tutorial looks strangely familiar!
Yeah, plagiarism never gets old, does it?
Just a bit old, yes... and wrong. There is no such thing as Linux 7.1 -- Linux
is not synonymous with RedHat, and Linux (the kernel) is only on 2.4!
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 11:35:13 Rick DeNatale wrote:
- Linux 7.1 or Windows 95/98/2000/NT operating system
Stealing from yourself is not plagiarism. It's just re-use, and something every good programmer should practice diligently.
Lyle Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Leslie Viljoen <leslieviljoen@gmail.com> wrote:
This tutorial looks strangely familiar!
Yeah, plagiarism never gets old, does it?
--
Ron Fox
NSCL
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824-1321
Not wholesale, but several bits from his "Ruby Quick Reference Guide"
are copied from the online versions of "Programming Ruby" (1st ed.)
and "Ruby in a Nutshell" (1st ed.) without attribution. Don't know if
that's true for the other sections or not (I didn't check).
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:54 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Lyle Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Leslie Viljoen <leslieviljoen@gmail.com> >> wrote:
This tutorial looks strangely familiar!
Yeah, plagiarism never gets old, does it?
Is this content copied from somewhere?
2.4 ? Hmmm, from which quadrant do you post ?
Ah ! It's just a typo... 
Le Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:22:37 -0500, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> a écrit :
[...] There is no such thing as Linux 7.1 -- Linux
is not synonymous with RedHat, and Linux (the kernel)
is only on 2.4!
--
Jacques.
[Advertisment] Don't rely on light speed to download
latest version. Come on Earth and stay up to date!
No, but stealing from other authors' work is. So unless the authors of "Progamming Ruby" and "Ruby in a Nutshell" have approved this "reuse" of their work, there's a problem.
On Jun 5, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Ron Fox wrote:
Stealing from yourself is not plagiarism.
uname -srv
Linux 2.6.24-r8
Is my kernel from the future?
On 03:22 Thu 05 Jun , David Masover wrote:
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 11:35:13 Rick DeNatale wrote:
> - Linux 7.1 or Windows 95/98/2000/NT operating system
Just a bit old, yes... and wrong. There is no such thing as Linux 7.1 -- Linux
is not synonymous with RedHat, and Linux (the kernel) is only on 2.4!
Ron Fox wrote:
Stealing from yourself is not plagiarism. It's just re-use, and something every good programmer should practice diligently.
--
Kam-Hung Soh <a href="http://kamhungsoh.com/blog">Software Salariman</a>
Yes, there's a problem - however, assuming this is actually edited
into a new coherent whole (I didn't see if there were new bits, it
looked familiar from many years back) there's also some amount of work
done. Assuming the author is misguided rather than malicious, we
should applaud him for that work, even if he's using sources wrongly,
and then try to help him do things in a way that's more generally
accepted in a copyright-focused world.
Eivind.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Lyle Johnson <lyle@lylejohnson.name> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Ron Fox wrote:
Stealing from yourself is not plagiarism.
No, but stealing from other authors' work is. So unless the authors of
"Progamming Ruby" and "Ruby in a Nutshell" have approved this "reuse" of
their work, there's a problem.
Hi --
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, forgottenwizard wrote:
On 03:22 Thu 05 Jun , David Masover wrote:
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 11:35:13 Rick DeNatale wrote:
- Linux 7.1 or Windows 95/98/2000/NT operating system
Just a bit old, yes... and wrong. There is no such thing as Linux 7.1 -- Linux
is not synonymous with RedHat, and Linux (the kernel) is only on 2.4!uname -srv
Linux 2.6.24-r8
Is my kernel from the future?
I once compiled a kernel whose timestamp was earlier than the
timestamp of the .tgz file from which I'd gotten the source (thanks to
the time difference with Europe
David
--
Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light:
INTRO TO RAILS June 9-12 Berlin
ADVANCING WITH RAILS June 16-19 Berlin
See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!
What's funny is how we are allowed to publish college text books as
2nd or 3rd Ed. and charge more for them, when most of the editing was
in fact correctional, and the resale value of such a book is paltry at
best. Of course, I'm talking more about older tech basic texts, like
physics, math, some engineering, etc.
Poor students.
There's a tiny little part of me that thinks the business is better
than even real estate.
Todd
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Kam-Hung Soh <kamhung.soh@gmail.com> wrote:
Ron Fox wrote:
Stealing from yourself is not plagiarism. It's just re-use, and
something every good programmer should practice diligently.
Eivind Eklund wrote:
Stealing from yourself is not plagiarism.
No, but stealing from other authors' work is. So unless the authors of
"Progamming Ruby" and "Ruby in a Nutshell" have approved this "reuse" of
their work, there's a problem.
Yes, there's a problem - however, assuming this is actually edited
into a new coherent whole (I didn't see if there were new bits, it
looked familiar from many years back) there's also some amount of work
done. Assuming the author is misguided rather than malicious, we
should applaud him for that work, even if he's using sources wrongly,
and then try to help him do things in a way that's more generally
accepted in a copyright-focused world.Eivind.
I want to concur. Please remember that most people are NOT malicicious, and that re-use is a major factor in all the arts and sciences. Finally, in the course of our general intellectual development, it acquired a formal name: refactoring. I consider it one of the most important things we do in cultural evolution. I love the notion of refactoring.
Every day needs its own version of the truth, for it's a new day.
And yes, giving credit matters. But not as much as being useful. And...at some point, we all lose contact with our sources. How much can you carry on YOUR back?
That said...get those sources in order, and make appropriate attributions. It's about being respectful, of both sources and readers.
I, too, am writing a Ruby book - but it's just for me. Some of us just can't hold ourselves back.
t.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Lyle Johnson <lyle@lylejohnson.name> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Ron Fox wrote:
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Cloyd, MS MA, LMHC
Private practice Psychotherapist
Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A: (360) 920-1226
<< tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email)
<< TomCloyd.com >> (website & psychotherapy weblog)
<< sleightmind.wordpress.com >> (mental health issues weblog)
<< directpathdesign.com >> (web site design & consultation)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~