What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
Jamal
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
Jamal
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
There is YARV I think that makes bytecode and there is JRuby which at
some point may create bytecode (Java), there is a a .NET project to
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Eric Hodel wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled ruby files), no.
PS: Don't top post.
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
There is YARV I think that makes bytecode and there is JRuby which at
some point may create bytecode (Java), there is a a .NET project to
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
— Derek Milhous Zumsteg
I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly... He said ruby 2 and that
is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go
Eric Hodel wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
ruby files), no.PS: Don't top post.
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.netA: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
� Derek Milhous Zumsteg
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
PS: Don't top post.
And I was all ready to ask "What's top posting?" but happily finished reading the message...
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
— Derek Milhous Zumsteg
What an incredibly elegant example. I love it. Although I personally will not adopt the jargon, but will still admonish others merely to not post the answer to somebody's question before posting the quoted question. Mostly 'cause I probably won't remember the term next time I need it.
And yes, this is a 97% content-free posting, but I just couldn't resist jumping up and down, pointing at the example, and going "ook! ook!"
On May 22, 2006, at 15:25, Eric Hodel wrote:
$ ruby-yarv -v
ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-04-08) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 497 (2006-05-07) [opts: ]
PS: Don't top post, no, really.
On May 23, 2006, at 12:41 AM, Kris Leech wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
ruby files), no.PS: Don't top post.
I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly... He said ruby 2 and that
is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
— Derek Milhous Zumsteg