What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
Jamal
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
···
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
There is YARV I think that makes bytecode and there is JRuby which at
some point may create bytecode (Java), there is a a .NET project to
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Eric Hodel wrote:
···
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled ruby files), no.
PS: Don't top post.
···
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
There is YARV I think that makes bytecode and there is JRuby which at
some point may create bytecode (Java), there is a a .NET project to
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
— Derek Milhous Zumsteg
I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly... He said ruby 2 and that
is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go 
Eric Hodel wrote:
···
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
ruby files), no.PS: Don't top post.
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.netA: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
� Derek Milhous Zumsteg
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
PS: Don't top post.
And I was all ready to ask "What's top posting?" but happily finished reading the message...
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
— Derek Milhous Zumsteg
What an incredibly elegant example. I love it. Although I personally will not adopt the jargon, but will still admonish others merely to not post the answer to somebody's question before posting the quoted question. Mostly 'cause I probably won't remember the term next time I need it.
And yes, this is a 97% content-free posting, but I just couldn't resist jumping up and down, pointing at the example, and going "ook! ook!"
···
On May 22, 2006, at 15:25, Eric Hodel wrote:
$ ruby-yarv -v
ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-04-08) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 497 (2006-05-07) [opts: ]
PS: Don't top post, no, really.
···
On May 23, 2006, at 12:41 AM, Kris Leech wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris Leech wrote:
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
ruby files), no.PS: Don't top post.
I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly... He said ruby 2 and that
is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
— Derek Milhous Zumsteg