Year in scripting languages?

ruby-talk
1

Does this work exist anywhere yet? I’ve seen a few references to it.

Thanks in advance,
Christopher

2

Bye,
-A.

···

Am Dienstag, 7. Januar 2003 20:05 schrieb christopher.j.meisenzahl@citicorp.com:

Does this work exist anywhere yet? I’ve seen a few references to it.

Armin Roehrl, http://www.approximity.com
We manage risk

3

Hmmm, the page says:

The Test:Unit library (http://testunit.talbott.ws) is now included
in the standard Ruby distribution.

I can’t see this in 1.6.8. Have I not looked hard enough, or is
this only in 1.8.x?

    Thank you,
    Hugh
···

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Armin Roehrl wrote:

http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?RubyIn2002

4

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

Hmmm, the page says:

The Test:Unit library (http://testunit.talbott.ws) is now included
in the standard Ruby distribution.

I can’t see this in 1.6.8. Have I not looked hard enough, or is
this only in 1.8.x?

No, it’s for the 1.8 release.

5

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

> Hmmm, the page says:
> <quote>
> The Test:Unit library (http://testunit.talbott.ws) is now included
> in the standard Ruby distribution.
> </quote>
>
> I can't see this in 1.6.8. Have I not looked hard enough, or is
> this only in 1.8.x?

No, it's for the 1.8 release.

I think this should be reflected in the final doc, because Matz has
warned us that there is still "wet paint" on 1.8.

        Hugh

···

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Lyle Johnson wrote: