Why no TextMate for Linux?

> In fact, that's exactly what they do anyway -- they just charge an
> additional, arbitrary "smartphone" fee on top of it if you happen to be
> using a smartphone. And you're saying it's because of bandwidth? With
> what they're charging for bandwidth, you'd think that's already built
> into the bandwidth plan -- and it has to be, to some extent, given that
> my "non-smartphone" can already download apps, music, and video, and can
> message/email said music/video to others.

It may well be, but I suspect that in practice, the difference in network
load between a phone that watches youtube and a phone that browses plain
text web sites is pretty large.

Certainly. But again, that's something which can be dealt with in practice,
not pre-emptively.

> Well, again, it comes down to compiling Ruby vs compiling your C program.
> If they can compile Ruby, there's no compiling needed for your Ruby
> script, it just runs -- so it's still exactly one compile step.

Except that, in practice, "I need to install a new programming language" is
a bigger deal than "I'll run this thing which uses existing standard
tools".

Well, except in this case, they're pretty much the same thing.

···

On Sunday 21 March 2010 12:35:12 am Seebs wrote:

Not really. I have written dozens of one-off C programs for that
system, even though I don't feel like spending the effort it would
take to get Ruby running on it. :wink:

-s

···

On 2010-03-21, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> wrote:

Except that, in practice, "I need to install a new programming language" is
a bigger deal than "I'll run this thing which uses existing standard
tools".

Well, except in this case, they're pretty much the same thing.

--
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam@seebs.net
| Seebs.Net <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
Fair game (Scientology) - Wikipedia <-- get educated!