http://www.e-texteditor.com/index.html
Check it out.
That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port it
the other way -- to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.
Then again, I doubt I'd be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
to give it a fair shake.
···
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William Smith wrote:
http://www.e-texteditor.com/index.html
Check it out.
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
"The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your time waving your
hands and hopping when a rock or a club will do." - McCloctnick the Lucid
Hi --
···
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, William Smith wrote:
That's funny -- for the following reason: the second computer I used,
in 1972, was a PDP-10, and the text editor I used was called E. When
you started it up, it said:
*****************************
This is the Yale editor, E!
*****************************
and when you did something illegal, it said:
*****************************
No can do.
*****************************
which lingered on the screen for a second or two before your document
reappeared.
Just typing those out and looking at them is a quasi-Proustian
experience for me.... 
David
--
Q. What is THE Ruby book for Rails developers?
A. RUBY FOR RAILS by David A. Black (http://www.manning.com/black\)
(See what readers are saying! http://www.rubypal.com/r4rrevs.pdf\)
Q. Where can I get Ruby/Rails on-site training, consulting, coaching?
A. Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypal.com)
Btw, for Linux, has anyone tried Scribes? (http://scribes.sf.net)
In this month's Linux journal, they mention it as an editor for Linux very similar to textmate. I don't use textmate (not enough to make me leave Linux behind), so can't speak to how similar it actually is. Can anyone on the list?
Thanks,
JB
Er...you mean to Linux, right :-). When it gets to Linux, I'll give it a go.
JB
···
----- "Chad Perrin" <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William Smith wrote:
> http://www.e-texteditor.com/index.html
>
> Check it out.That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port
it
the other way -- to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.
Then again, I doubt I'd be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
to give it a fair shake.
I did. There are definitely places where vi wins, but TextMate's
pretty awesome. It's my default editor these days.
Chad Perrin wrote:
···
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William Smith wrote:
Check it out.
That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port it
the other way -- to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.Then again, I doubt I'd be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
to give it a fair shake.
i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but its a great and very productive tool.
--
Jonas Hartmann
www : http://www.Jonas-Hartmann.com
eMail : Mail@Jonas-Hartmann.com
icq : 13971744
skype : ionas82
home : +49 (0)6071 2 79 45 97 (AB)
mobile : +49 (0)160 99 2 44 679 (SMS)
I can't answer your question, since I haven't used TextMate either, but
Scribes is available in FreeBSD's ports tree. If it wasn't for the
dependency on GNOME libraries, I'd be installing it right now.
C'est la vie.
···
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 02:01:08AM +0900, JB Wells wrote:
----- "William Smith" <wbsmith83@gmail.com> wrote:
> 人気の自動車保険を口コミ・相場からランキングでご紹介!
>
> Check it out.Btw, for Linux, has anyone tried Scribes? (http://scribes.sf.net)
In this month's Linux journal, they mention it as an editor for Linux very similar to textmate. I don't use textmate (not enough to make me leave Linux behind), so can't speak to how similar it actually is. Can anyone on the list?
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Amazon.com interview candidate: "When C++ is your
hammer, everything starts to look like your thumb."
I've downloaded and tried e-texteditor some weeks ago and I found that it lacks a file explorer view.
Is it planned to have such a feature ?
CM.
···
---------------------------------
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
<advertisement>
And a little bird tells me that the book for it will ship early next week:
http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/textmate/index.html
(Amazon already has it in stock.)
</advertisement>
James Edward Gray II
···
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:16 AM, Giles Bowkett wrote:
Then again, I doubt I'd be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
to give it a fair shake.I did. There are definitely places where vi wins, but TextMate's
pretty awesome. It's my default editor these days.
Chad Perrin wrote:
>>人気の自動車保険を口コミ・相場からランキングでご紹介!
>>
>>Check it out.
>
>That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port it
>the other way -- to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.
>
>Then again, I doubt I'd be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
>to give it a fair shake.
>i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode
it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on
os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but
its a great and very productive tool.
I'm just wondering whether E is shipping with a bunch of Textmate bundles
taken without permission from the actual Textmate app. Anyone know?
Disclaimer: I use Vim, and like it. Textmate is just a curiosity to me.
Jonas Hartmann
--Greg
···
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:30:06AM +0900, Jonas Hartmann wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William Smith wrote:
TextMate is slow? What part(s)?
Ben
···
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007, Jonas Hartmann wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode
it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on
os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but
its a great and very productive tool.
I'd have to see it to believe it -- and for that to happen, it'd
probably have to become available on free unices rather than just
proprietary operating systems.
···
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:16:45AM +0900, Giles Bowkett wrote:
>Then again, I doubt I'd be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
>to give it a fair shake.I did. There are definitely places where vi wins, but TextMate's
pretty awesome. It's my default editor these days.
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2);
Actually, using Qt 4 might be a good way to keep me from trying it out,
especially since Qt generally means "plus thirty KDE libraries".
···
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:30:06AM +0900, Jonas Hartmann wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William Smith wrote:
>>人気の自動車保険を口コミ・相場からランキングでご紹介!
>>
>>Check it out.
>
>That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port it
>the other way -- to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.
>
>Then again, I doubt I'd be able to tear myself away from Vim long enough
>to give it a fair shake.i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode
it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on
os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but
its a great and very productive tool.
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
"The ability to quote is a serviceable
substitute for wit." - W. Somerset Maugham
Actually, I'd like to see it on FreeBSD first for two reasons:
1. If it shows up on FreeBSD first, it'll make its way to Linux
shortly. If it shows up on Linux first, it may never appear on
FreeBSD.
2. FreeBSD is better.
Err, no really, I'm not trolling. I just found that for my purposes
FreeBSD is better -- after several years of being a devoted Debian fan.
YMMV.
···
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:58:19PM +0900, JB Wells wrote:
----- "Chad Perrin" <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0900, William Smith wrote:
> > http://www.e-texteditor.com/index.html
> >
> > Check it out.
>
> That would require using MS Windows. When is someone going to port
> it
> the other way -- to FreeBSD? That might be interesting.Er...you mean to Linux, right :-). When it gets to Linux, I'll give it a go.
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
unix virus: If you're using a unixlike OS, please forward
this to 20 others and erase your system partition.
Hi,
···
2007/2/23, Ruby Admirer <ruby_admirer@yahoo.com>:
I've downloaded and tried e-texteditor some weeks ago and I found that it lacks a file explorer view.
Is it planned to have such a feature ?
That's called project management, and that was put in a few weeks ago
too. You might want to give it another try. I bought the software
and am a very happy user so far.
Alexander's a very responsive coder, and I haven't had any problems with e.
Bye !
--
François Beausoleil
http://blog.teksol.info/
http://piston.rubyforge.org/
I'm just wondering whether E is shipping with a bunch of Textmate bundles
taken without permission from the actual Textmate app. Anyone know?
"Allan was very positive about the prospect of me making the editor
compatible with textmate, and he had no problems with me using the
textmate bundles. Having more people, on more platforms, to use and
improve the bundles, could only make them even more powerful and
comprehensive."
Source: 人気の自動車保険を口コミ・相場からランキングでご紹介!
Regards,
Rimantas
···
TextMate's bundles are open source, unlike the application. No rules are broken here.
Allan Odgaard, the creator of TextMate, has been supportive of the e editor effort.
James Edward Gray II
···
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I'm just wondering whether E is shipping with a bunch of Textmate bundles
taken without permission from the actual Textmate app. Anyone know?
Does anyone know if e supports Textmate-like word-completion? (I should say
emacs-like) I didn't find any documentation for it, but it seems to me
that's one of the first things that you would hype
Mushfeq.
···
On 2/23/07, Ben Bleything <ben@bleything.net> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007, Jonas Hartmann wrote:
> Chad Perrin wrote:
> i wonder, with all the fame it got, why the textmate guys dont recode
> it based on QT4 and add skinning and make it feel native like it is on
> os x. its slow now and i cant imagen it getting so much slower ;p but
> its a great and very productive tool.TextMate is slow? What part(s)?
Ben
Ben Bleything wrote:
TextMate is slow? What part(s)?
"Find in Project" regularly takes upwards of 60 seconds for me, during
which TextMate is completely unresponsive, its memory usage rockets from
30 MB up to over 900 MB (!), and every other application I'm running
slows down to the point of near-unusability (probably due to the memory
usage).
It's also a good deal slower than TextWrangler at opening large text
files (say, over 8 MB).
Having said that, it's still the only text editor I use. It's a
fantastic piece of software. I wouldn't mind seeing Find in Project
speeded up in the next version, though. 
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.