What we have here is a retard pretending to be a computer scientist

ruby-talk
1

atbusbook@aol.com wrote:

http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~scg/Archive/Papers/Scha04bOOEncapsulation.pdf
. this retard thinks Smalltalk and Ruby don't have private public and
what not. what a joke. This is almost as bad as James McGovern without
the pictures

Thanks for the article. Very nice at first glance, nothing retardish
spotted so far.

Gennady.

2

>http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~scg/Archive/Papers/Scha04bOOEncapsulation.pdf
> . this retard thinks Smalltalk and Ruby don't have private public and
> what not. what a joke. This is almost as bad as James McGovern without
> the picturesThanks for the article. Very nice at first glance, nothing retardish
spotted so far.

Gennady.

···

On Dec 28, 6:30 pm, "Gennady Bystritsky" <Gennady.Bystrit...@quest.com> wrote:

atbusb...@aol.com wrote:

3

Sorry blank post. but saying ruby has no encapsulation of methods is
funny, it is pretty stupid if you ask me.

···

On Dec 28, 6:39 pm, atbusb...@aol.com wrote:

On Dec 28, 6:30 pm, "Gennady Bystritsky" <Gennady.Bystrit...@quest.com> > wrote:

> atbusb...@aol.com wrote:
> >http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~scg/Archive/Papers/Scha04bOOEncapsulation.pdf
> > . this retard thinks Smalltalk and Ruby don't have private public and
> > what not. what a joke. This is almost as bad as James McGovern without
> > the picturesThanks for the article. Very nice at first glance, nothing retardish
> spotted so far.

> Gennady.

4

Where exactly do you read that in the article?

Regards

  robert

···

On 29.12.2006 01:42, atbusbook@aol.com wrote:

Sorry blank post. but saying ruby has no encapsulation of methods is
funny, it is pretty stupid if you ask me.

5

Robert Klemme wrote:

> Sorry blank post. but saying ruby has no encapsulation of methods is
> funny, it is pretty stupid if you ask me.

Where exactly do you read that in the article?

I think he was referring to this (starts at the bottom of page 1 of the
original article):

"Popular dynamically typed languages such as Smalltalk, Self, Python,
and Ruby still provide no encapsulation at all, or support it in a very
limited way."

and then later on page 3:

"None of these languages provide any support for declaring internal
methods that cannot be invoked from outside of the class in which they
are defined."

Jeff

···

On 29.12.2006 01:42, atbusbook@aol.com wrote: