Komodo (win)
-----Original Message-----
From: list-bounce@example.com [mailto:list-bounce@example.com] On Behalf
Of Jan Friedrich
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:10 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: What is your favourite IDE?
John Mettraux wrote:
2007/4/12, ChrisKaelin <ck.stonedragon@gmail.com>:
So what IDE do you prefer in order to code and to debug ruby?
vim, bash, grep, less, ...
+ sed
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
TextMate!
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:12 PM, Alexey Kalmykov wrote:
Komodo (win)
-----Original Message-----
From: list-bounce@example.com [mailto:list-bounce@example.com] On Behalf
Of Jan Friedrich
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:10 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: What is your favourite IDE?John Mettraux wrote:
2007/4/12, ChrisKaelin <ck.stonedragon@gmail.com>:
So what IDE do you prefer in order to code and to debug ruby?
vim, bash, grep, less, ...
+ sed
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
vim, and when not on Linux, unixutils.
Jason
On 4/12/07, Alexey Kalmykov <akalmykov@openwaygroup.com> wrote:
Komodo (win)
-----Original Message-----
From: list-bounce@example.com [mailto:list-bounce@example.com] On Behalf
Of Jan Friedrich
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:10 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: What is your favourite IDE?John Mettraux wrote:
> 2007/4/12, ChrisKaelin <ck.stonedragon@gmail.com>:
>>
>> So what IDE do you prefer in order to code and to debug ruby?
>
> vim, bash, grep, less, ...
+ sed--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
vim, sometimes JEdit
sk
On 4/12/07, Alexey Kalmykov <akalmykov@openwaygroup.com> wrote:
Komodo (win)
-----Original Message-----
From: list-bounce@example.com [mailto:list-bounce@example.com] On Behalf
Of Jan Friedrich
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:10 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: What is your favourite IDE?John Mettraux wrote:
> 2007/4/12, ChrisKaelin <ck.stonedragon@gmail.com>:
>>
>> So what IDE do you prefer in order to code and to debug ruby?
>
> vim, bash, grep, less, ...
+ sed--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
I've used just about every IDE there is and Textmate blows them all out
of the water.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
i am in linux so i have textmate - envy.
scribes comes pretty close, i think, in workflow though.
sk
On 4/12/07, John Joyce <dangerwillrobinsondanger@gmail.com> wrote:
TextMate!
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:12 PM, Alexey Kalmykov wrote:
>
> Komodo (win)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: list-bounce@example.com [mailto:list-bounce@example.com] On
> Behalf
> Of Jan Friedrich
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:10 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: What is your favourite IDE?
>
> John Mettraux wrote:
>> 2007/4/12, ChrisKaelin <ck.stonedragon@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> So what IDE do you prefer in order to code and to debug ruby?
>>
>> vim, bash, grep, less, ...
> + sed
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
>
Geany!
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:01:07 +0900, John Joyce wrote:
TextMate!
Raymond O'Connor wrote:
I've used just about every IDE there is and Textmate blows them all out of the water.
Yes it does ... and it's very inexpensive ... less than $100US for the software, which is not open source, and about $1000US for a base iMac. 
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P)
http://borasky-research.net/
If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits fire.
Well, I should've written "vi, emacs, irb and commandline do not
count", but that would've given me some flames 
BTW, does textmate support debugging?
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Raymond O'Connor wrote:
I've used just about every IDE there is and Textmate blows them all out of the water.
Yes it does ... and it's very inexpensive ... less than $100US for the software, which is not open source, and about $1000US for a base iMac.
Does that mean, you'd be willing to donate Textmate and an iMac to me? 
--
Phillip "CynicalRyan" Gawlowski
http://cynicalryan.110mb.com/
http://clothred.rubyforge.org
Rule of Open-Source Programming #11:
When a developer says he will work on something, he or she means
"maybe".
Not really. It doesn't have a built-in debugger, if that's what you meant.
James Edward Gray II
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:35 AM, ChrisKaelin wrote:
BTW, does textmate support debugging?
Not a flame: how do they not count?
IDE stands for "Integrated Development Environment". I can't speak
for VI users, but Emacs has Ruby source code editing, project
management, the ability to cross-reference code symbols,
auto-completion, source templates, integrated source-level debugging
(if you want it), IRB, and the ability to run your code and tests
right from the editor. What's missing that it fails to qualify as an
IDE?
On 4/12/07, ChrisKaelin <ck.stonedragon@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, I should've written "vi, emacs, irb and commandline do not
count", but that would've given me some flames
--
Avdi
Huh? That's just arbitrary nonsense!
(this may be a flame)
I dare you to define IDE under pain of slashdotting.
(why is slashdot so flamey?)
Seriously though, editors are viable as IDEs if they do the sending to the compiler/parser.
TextMate, like EMACS is often more of a nexus of tools, but isn't that what the "I" in IDE is all about?
From that note, what constitutes debugging? Stepping through a program with breakpoints? Perhaps, but no. Debugging is simply removing the bugs by any means necessary.
irb is an unusual case only seriously matched by shell code and SmallTalk.
On Apr 12, 2007, at 10:35 PM, ChrisKaelin wrote:
Well, I should've written "vi, emacs, irb and commandline do not
count", but that would've given me some flamesBTW, does textmate support debugging?
i love these favorite editor / ide threads, i am always looking for a
new one to play around with. I have always found the coolest things in
these threads.
sk
On 4/12/07, John Joyce <dangerwillrobinsondanger@gmail.com> wrote:
Huh? That's just arbitrary nonsense!
(this may be a flame)
I dare you to define IDE under pain of slashdotting.
(why is slashdot so flamey?)
Seriously though, editors are viable as IDEs if they do the sending
to the compiler/parser.
TextMate, like EMACS is often more of a nexus of tools, but isn't
that what the "I" in IDE is all about?
From that note, what constitutes debugging? Stepping through a
program with breakpoints? Perhaps, but no. Debugging is simply
removing the bugs by any means necessary.irb is an unusual case only seriously matched by shell code and
SmallTalk.On Apr 12, 2007, at 10:35 PM, ChrisKaelin wrote:
> Well, I should've written "vi, emacs, irb and commandline do not
> count", but that would've given me some flames
>
> BTW, does textmate support debugging?
>
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:46:16 +0900, Avdi Grimm wrote:
On 4/12/07, ChrisKaelin <ck.stonedragon@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, I should've written "vi, emacs, irb and commandline do not
count", but that would've given me some flamesNot a flame: how do they not count?
IDE stands for "Integrated Development Environment". I can't speak
for VI users, but Emacs has Ruby source code editing, project
management, the ability to cross-reference code symbols,
auto-completion, source templates, integrated source-level debugging
(if you want it), IRB, and the ability to run your code and tests
right from the editor. What's missing that it fails to qualify as an
IDE?
How can this http://platypope.org/yada/emacs-demo/ not be considered an
IDE?
PS - I don't use Emacs. I use Vim + any nix utilities I need.
--
Mark
