Webrick and ruby

From: ptkwt@aracnet.com [mailto:ptkwt@aracnet.com]

ruby + webrick + fastcgi + amrita + object prevalence

How about including borges as well?

I’ve got ruby + webrick + amrita + borges on the boil… Trying to fit in
Prevayler somewhere too.

David

···

ahoward ahoward@fsl.noaa.gov wrote:

Hi David,

I read your post to the Sydney mailing list the other day, but didn’t reply since I haven’t really played with any of that stuff.

However, I just started playing with Raggle (an RSS displayer), which now has a --server command-line option to turn it into a browser-accessible server. It uses WEBrick, so I was planning to use its code as a starting point for looking at WEBrick sometime soon.

Note that I had to hack it slightly to make it work on Windows here at work (because the --server stuff isn’t yet split out from the ncurses stuff; hence I had to comment out a number of ncruses-specific pieces of code, so the parser didn’t barf). However, it ran fine straight out of CVS on my Linux system at home.

Just thought you might find it interesting in case you haven’t seen Raggle yet.

Cheers,

Harry O.

Sorry about that. I intended it to go just to David!

I’m certain I clicked “reply to sender only”, but obviously Mozilla doesn’t agree :-).

H.

However, I just started playing with Raggle (an RSS displayer), which
now has a --server command-line option to turn it into a
browser-accessible server. It uses WEBrick, so I was planning to use
its code as a starting point for looking at WEBrick sometime soon.

Very interesting!

I was approached some time ago to make a cross-platform RSS-inspired
project, but wouldn’t touch it because I wasn’t sure that I could make
a system that was free of dependencies. It looks that webbrick and
madelain should make that possible. Maybe I shouldn’t have been so
quick to turn it down ;).

Thanks for the notice!

···


David Heinemeier Hansson,
http://www.loudthinking.com/ – Thoughts for free
http://www.nextangle.com/ – Thoughts for hire

Aber verdammt!

I made the same mistake as Howard. And mine was even worse as I’ve
already seen his. Sorry about the private correspondence spam ;).

/ David

David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

Aber verdammt!

I made the same mistake as Howard. And mine was even worse as I’ve
already seen his. Sorry about the private correspondence spam ;).

No sweat. We’ve all done it. Or at least I have.

The worst was this guy several months ago who sent mail to ruby-talk
not even intended for anyone on the list. It was for his mom. :slight_smile:

Hal