I think if you pay close attention you'll see that your browser goes to the first url and then gets redirected by the server to the second url. The proper thing to do would be to actually do the redirection, not munge the url directly.
There is no defined generic semantic for the path and query parameters
in an URL. Semantic is only defined for the leading parts (protocol,
host, port etc.). How do you expect any mechanism to know that the
last part is a checksum (of what btw?)? I mean, completely
independent from technical questions of parsing: how would a piece of
software detect the checksum from looking at the URL?
For specific formatted URLs it's a different story (see Sam's suggestion).
Kind regards
robert
···
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:14 PM, rubix Rubix <aggouni2002@yahoo.fr> wrote:
I think if you pay close attention you'll see that your browser goes to the
first url and then gets redirected by the server to the second url. The
proper thing to do would be to actually do the redirection, not munge the
url directly.
--
Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f