Why does this work:
...
puts soup.a
...
but adding .string a la:
...
puts soup.a.string
...
results in:
undefined method `string' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) ??
This means that the return value of "soup.a" is nil. Nil is an object in
Ruby, so:
puts nil
passes a nil object to the 'puts' method. The 'puts' method calls the
'to_s' method on the argument(s) passed to it. Nil has a to_s method
(that returns an empty string), so all is well.
However, nil does not have a 'string' method, which is the error you are
getting. Perhaps you are confusing Ruby with another language, and
actually meant:
puts soup.a.to_s
?
···
From: Comfort Eagle
Gavin Kistner wrote:
From: Comfort Eagle
Why does this work:
...
puts soup.a
...
but adding .string a la:
...
puts soup.a.string
...
results in:
undefined method `string' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) ??
This means that the return value of "soup.a" is nil. Nil is an object in
Ruby, so:
puts nil
passes a nil object to the 'puts' method. The 'puts' method calls the
'to_s' method on the argument(s) passed to it. Nil has a to_s method
(that returns an empty string), so all is well.
However, nil does not have a 'string' method, which is the error you are
getting. Perhaps you are confusing Ruby with another language, and
actually meant:
puts soup.a.to_s
?
Perhaps, but soup.a gives me actual results other than nil. ".a" is a
rubyful_soup method.
//Hoping I explained that correctly.
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.