It doesn’t have to be, in Ruby, and I think that it is more readable –
in Ruby.
-austin
···
-----Original Message-----
From: David Garamond [mailto:lists@zara.6.isreserved.com]
Eric Hodel wrote:The assert_follows_spec() could even perform several
iterations of tests if wanted, to test deterministic-ness.
If you’ve got a spec like this, why not write a method to
autogenerate test methods?
Why is that better than something like assert_follows_spec()?
It’s not more readable IMO, it’s not shorter, it adds an additional
step in the Makefile/build process.
–
austin ziegler * austin.ziegler@evault.com