Substitution with Hash

ruby-talk
1

Ok i'll try to explain what i mean as well as i can

Lets say i have a hash like this

hash { 'a' => '1' } #just as example, its actually far bigger

and if a user inputs abcdabcd i was it to sub all of the a's with 1's..

As i said, the hash is far larger which is why i can't just do it with
gsub..

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance..

Lee

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

2

Lee Jarvis wrote the following on 11.09.2007 12:41 :

Ok i'll try to explain what i mean as well as i can

Lets say i have a hash like this

hash { 'a' => '1' } #just as example, its actually far bigger

and if a user inputs abcdabcd i was it to sub all of the a's with 1's..

As i said, the hash is far larger which is why i can't just do it with
gsub..

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance..

Lee
  
yourstring.split(//).map{|c| hash[c] || c}.join

3

Lionel Bouton wrote the following on 11.09.2007 12:48 :

Lee Jarvis wrote the following on 11.09.2007 12:41 :
  

Ok i'll try to explain what i mean as well as i can

Lets say i have a hash like this

hash { 'a' => '1' } #just as example, its actually far bigger

and if a user inputs abcdabcd i was it to sub all of the a's with 1's..

As i said, the hash is far larger which is why i can't just do it with
gsub..

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance..

Lee
  
yourstring.split(//).map{|c| hash[c] || c}.join

Note that if your hash is only used to convert single characters to
single characters, you can use String#tr (or tr!). If you are after
performance, as you must prepare the strings used by String#tr from your
hash, you'll have to bench it to see if it's worth it in your use case
even if String#tr is faster in itself.
If you are processing UTF-8 content, String#tr is probably not safe
(there are libraries out there for fixing this though IIRC), but my
first answer probably is (assuming $KCODE='u'; require 'jcode'...) as
the regexp processing is utf-8 aware, so the String#split should be safe.

Lionel

4

Thanks that worked well, And no its not single chars, Which is the only
reason i'm doing it this way..

I have to split on whitespace (/ /) because spliting on characters would
obviously split the text i want to transform, which means it wont match
if the characters are trailing another word, HTML special chars for
example

h = {"~" => "~"}

"hmm ~'.split(/ /).map{|c| h[c] || c}.join(' ')

Outputs hmm ~, but obviously doing things like question marks wont work,
Maybe i'll have to use loops and string#tr

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

5

I'd rather not do the split step, IMHO direct replacement will be faster:

h = {"#126" => "~"}
s.gsub(/&([^;]+);/) {|c| h[c] || "&#{c};"}

Btw, I believe there are standard classes that do this type of
replacement (entities in HTML documents) - maybe it's in CGI.

Kind regards

robert

···

2007/9/11, Lee Jarvis <jarvo88@gmail.com>:

Thanks that worked well, And no its not single chars, Which is the only
reason i'm doing it this way..

I have to split on whitespace (/ /) because spliting on characters would
obviously split the text i want to transform, which means it wont match
if the characters are trailing another word, HTML special chars for
example

h = {"&#126;" => "~"}

"hmm &#126;'.split(/ /).map{|c| h[c] || c}.join(' ')

Outputs hmm ~, but obviously doing things like question marks wont work,
Maybe i'll have to use loops and string#tr

6

Lee Jarvis wrote:

Thanks that worked well, And no its not single chars, Which is the only reason i'm doing it this way..

I have to split on whitespace (/ /) because spliting on characters would obviously split the text i want to transform, which means it wont match if the characters are trailing another word, HTML special chars for example

h = {"&#126;" => "~"}

If you're just trying to translate numeric html entities it's easy:
   str.gsub(/&#(\d+);/){ [$1.to_i].pack('U') }
If you also want named entities I suggest the htmlentities gems.
If it's for a more general case, how about:
   rx = Regexp.new(hash.keys.map{|k|Regexp.escape(k)}.join("|"))
   str.gsub(rx){ hash[$&] }

Daniel

7

Robert Klemme wrote:

h = {"&#126;" => "~"}

"hmm &#126;'.split(/ /).map{|c| h[c] || c}.join(' ')

Outputs hmm ~, but obviously doing things like question marks wont work,
Maybe i'll have to use loops and string#tr
    
I'd rather not do the split step, IMHO direct replacement will be faster:
  
If it's all for html entities yes. I'm not sure of what the actual use
case is though.

h = {"#126" => "~"}
s.gsub(/&([^;]+);/) {|c| h[c] || "&#{c};"}

Btw, I believe there are standard classes that do this type of
replacement (entities in HTML documents) - maybe it's in CGI.
  
The htmlentities gem (more robust than CGI with UTF-8...) is quite good.