Unless I’ve missed something, what about byte.reverse!
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Ohlsen [mailto:harryo@zip.com.au]I ended up with code like …
byte[0], byte[1], byte[2], byte[3] =
byte[3], byte[2], byte[1], byte[0]I can’t help but wonder whether there’s a cleverer way to do
this.
Yes, there’s another “working on 3 hours’ sleep” problem 
!!
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:51, Berger, Daniel wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Ohlsen [mailto:harryo@zip.com.au]I ended up with code like …
byte[0], byte[1], byte[2], byte[3] =
byte[3], byte[2], byte[1], byte[0]I can’t help but wonder whether there’s a cleverer way to do
this.Unless I’ve missed something, what about byte.reverse!