Is it possible for me to have output that go to the $stdout go through a
method instead? ie:
Have stuff go through this:
def write_to(str)
@socket.send(str, 0)
end
?
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Is it possible for me to have output that go to the $stdout go through a
method instead? ie:
Have stuff go through this:
def write_to(str)
@socket.send(str, 0)
end
?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
You can assign any object that responds to #write to $stdout.
See also:
http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2006/08/17/stdout-vs-stdout
On Mar 9, 2009, at 17:35, Tim Mcd wrote:
Is it possible for me to have output that go to the $stdout go through a
method instead? ie:Have stuff go through this:
def write_to(str)
@socket.send(str, 0)
end
In this case IO#reopen seems more appropriate IMHO (if it works with
Sockets, which I did not verify). It's faster (no Ruby code needed)
and will also work for sub processes.
Kind regards
robert
2009/3/10 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 17:35, Tim Mcd wrote:
Is it possible for me to have output that go to the $stdout go through a
method instead? ie:Have stuff go through this:
def write_to(str)
@socket.send(str, 0)
endYou can assign any object that responds to #write to $stdout.
See also:
http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2006/08/17/stdout-vs-stdout
--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end