Singleton object vs. enhancing singleton class

In ruby, as class are singleton objects, does anyone have any ideas when
a a singleton object should be used vs. simply adding methods to the
class? For example,

class Foo
  include Singleton
  def bar
  end
end

vs.

class Foo
  def self.bar
  end
end

In ruby, as class are singleton objects, does anyone have any ideas when
a a singleton object should be used vs. simply adding methods to the
class?

I always include Singleton, but I see what you mean. A better way might be to
do it with modules:

module Foo
  def self.bar
  end
end

One example is mixins, though. For example, here:

class Foo
  def self.bar
  end
end

A mixin would almost certainly be expecting to be mixed via "include" here,
not "extend". This might not always matter, but some mixins will define
things like self.included, and won't work at all if you try to extend them
instead.

However, a mixin which expected "extend" would still work on a Singleton
object:

class Foo
  include Singleton
  def bar
  end
end
Foo.instance.extend SomeMixin

I think the main reason for doing Singleton, though, is that it expresses
intent better, and it prevents the class from being instantiated -- sure,
there are ways around it, but you're not going to accidentally call Foo.new
without getting an error.

···

On Sunday 08 June 2008 22:35:25 Paul McMahon wrote:

Hi --

In ruby, as class are singleton objects, does anyone have any ideas when

I'd just say: classes are objects. Like other objects, they can have
methods added to them on a per-object basis (give or take the fact
that "per-object" in the case of a class actually includes
subclasses).

a a singleton object should be used vs. simply adding methods to the
class? For example,

class Foo
include Singleton
def bar
end
end

vs.

class Foo
def self.bar
end
end

I don't see these techniques as addressing the same problem or being
likely candidates to replace each other. I'd go by what you need. If
you need a class that has only one instance, then use Singleton. If
you've got a situation where there's class-level (as opposed to
instance-level) knowledge involved, then use a class method.

David

···

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Paul McMahon wrote:

--
Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light:
   INTRO TO RAILS June 9-12 Berlin
   ADVANCING WITH RAILS June 16-19 Berlin
   ADVANCING WITH RAILS July 21-24 Edison, NJ
See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!

In reply to myself:

it prevents the class from being instantiated

To clarify -- prevents it from being instantiated again.