I uploaded a gem about five hours ago and I'm still not seeing it in queries? About how long should it take the server to pick it up?
James Edward Gray II
James Edward Gray II wrote:
I uploaded a gem about five hours ago and I'm still not seeing it in queries? About how long should it take the server to pick it up?
I think the mirrors are updated every 30 minutes; though there may be a "push on update" process in place.
Some new mirrors have have come online recently( and 30-Second Rule should have its mirror set up in a day or so, I hope), so perhaps there is an issue with the mirroring process, and you're fetching from an out-of-date server.
Have you tried explicitly setting the gem server path to rubyforge.org?
James Britt
···
--
http://www.ruby-doc.org - Ruby Help & Documentation
Ruby Code & Style - Ruby Code & Style: Writers wanted
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com - Playing with Better Toys
http://www.30secondrule.com - Building Better Tools
James Edward Gray II wrote:
> I uploaded a gem about five hours ago and I'm still not seeing it in
> queries? About how long should it take the server to pick it up?
Should be about an hour or so... unless you're hitting that Ruby 1.8.3 +
RubyGems problem...
I think the mirrors are updated every 30 minutes; though there may be a
"push on update" process in place.
Yup, we're hoping to get to that soon... just need to get everyone
pulling gems/files from Dennis' mirror server...
Yours,
Tom
···
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:30 +0900, James Britt wrote:
Ah, yup, it's fastercsv, right? It's this:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/161508
Yours,
Tom
···
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:31 -0500, Tom Copeland wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:30 +0900, James Britt wrote:
> James Edward Gray II wrote:
> > I uploaded a gem about five hours ago and I'm still not seeing it in
> > queries? About how long should it take the server to pick it up?Should be about an hour or so... unless you're hitting that Ruby 1.8.3 +
RubyGems problem...
couldn't a coverter be made so you guys could trigger a
ruby183 foo.gem | ruby182 > foo.gem
to convert? only if this would be simple, but i bet someone on the list would
write the converter for you.
-a
···
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Tom Copeland wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:31 -0500, Tom Copeland wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:30 +0900, James Britt wrote:
James Edward Gray II wrote:
I uploaded a gem about five hours ago and I'm still not seeing it in
queries? About how long should it take the server to pick it up?Should be about an hour or so... unless you're hitting that Ruby 1.8.3 +
RubyGems problem...Ah, yup, it's fastercsv, right? It's this:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/161508
--
ara [dot] t [dot] howard [at] gmail [dot] com
all happiness comes from the desire for others to be happy. all misery
comes from the desire for oneself to be happy.
-- bodhicaryavatara
===============================================================================
Thank you. I was not aware of this issue.
For those following along, this does NOT appear to be fixed in Ruby 1.8.4 Preview 1.
James Edward Gray II
···
On Nov 16, 2005, at 8:37 AM, Tom Copeland wrote:
Ah, yup, it's fastercsv, right? It's this:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/161508
That would certainly work for me...
Tom
···
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 23:44 +0900, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Tom Copeland wrote:
> Ah, yup, it's fastercsv, right? It's this:
>
> http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/161508couldn't a coverter be made so you guys could trigger a
ruby183 foo.gem | ruby182 > foo.gem
to convert? only if this would be simple, but i bet someone on the list would
write the converter for you.