Rubyforge upload

RubyForge is currently suffering from a bug. Here's a link to the
ticket:

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=4841&group_id=5&atid=101

In sum, there's a problem uploading files via scp (and sftp). I appears
to stall after 100K of transfer. Normally Tom Copeland has these kinds
of things fixed in minutes of reporting them, but appearently this one
is being allusive. Does anyone have an idea what might be the problem?

Thanks,
T.

Yup, I think it's a problem with the NIC driver. I'm waiting until our
colo facility can get a console gizmo hooked up to the machine before
attempting to install an alternate driver; I don't want the machine to
go offline if the upgrade goes haywire. Hopefully I can get this
resolved today...

Yours,

Tom

···

On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 21:00 +0900, transfire@gmail.com wrote:

RubyForge is currently suffering from a bug. Here's a link to the
ticket:

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=4841&group_id=5&atid=101

In sum, there's a problem uploading files via scp (and sftp). I appears
to stall after 100K of transfer. Normally Tom Copeland has these kinds
of things fixed in minutes of reporting them, but appearently this one
is being allusive. Does anyone have an idea what might be the problem?

I think we've sorted this problem out; thanks to the various folks who
helped confirm it. There are still a few more problems which we're
steadily fixing; you can see the list here:

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=5&atid=101

Yours,

Tom

···

On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 11:10 -0400, Tom Copeland wrote:

On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 21:00 +0900, transfire@gmail.com wrote:
> RubyForge is currently suffering from a bug. Here's a link to the
> ticket:
>
>
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=4841&group_id=5&atid=101
>
> In sum, there's a problem uploading files via scp (and sftp). I appears
> to stall after 100K of transfer. Normally Tom Copeland has these kinds
> of things fixed in minutes of reporting them, but appearently this one
> is being allusive. Does anyone have an idea what might be the problem?

Yup, I think it's a problem with the NIC driver. I'm waiting until our
colo facility can get a console gizmo hooked up to the machine before
attempting to install an alternate driver; I don't want the machine to
go offline if the upgrade goes haywire. Hopefully I can get this
resolved today...

Yay! I can commit again :slight_smile: [verified for ruport]

···

On 6/26/06, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

I think we've sorted this problem out; thanks to the various folks who
helped confirm it. There are still a few more problems which we're
steadily fixing; you can see the list here:

quoth the Gregory Brown:

···

On 6/26/06, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> I think we've sorted this problem out; thanks to the various folks who
> helped confirm it. There are still a few more problems which we're
> steadily fixing; you can see the list here:

Yay! I can commit again :slight_smile: [verified for ruport]

I can also confirm that cvs commits are working...
Thanks Tom...

-d
--
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972

You're welcome, thanks for everyone's patience!

Yours,

Tom

···

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:41 +0900, darren kirby wrote:

quoth the Gregory Brown:
> On 6/26/06, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> > I think we've sorted this problem out; thanks to the various folks who
> > helped confirm it. There are still a few more problems which we're
> > steadily fixing; you can see the list here:
>
> Yay! I can commit again :slight_smile: [verified for ruport]

I can also confirm that cvs commits are working...
Thanks Tom...