Hello People,
Is ruby forge http://rubyforge.org/ down?
Yes, see for example the RubyForge article on Wikipedia.
Regards,
Marcus
···
Am 08.03.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Karthikeyan A K:
Is ruby forge http://rubyforge.org/ down?
--
GitHub: stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) · GitHub
PGP: 0x6B3A101A
It's up but « Could Not Connect to Database ».
So, I think we have to wait.
···
Le Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:24:43 +0530, Karthikeyan A K <karthikeyan@openmailbox.org> a écrit :
Hello People,
Is ruby forge http://rubyforge.org/ down?
--
┌─────────────┬───────────────────────────────────┐
│ Projet Bépo │ http://bepo.fr/ │
├─────────────┴───────────────────────────────────┤
│ Message tapé en Bépo sur un Typematrix 2030 USB │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Could be a long wait, since RubyForge was shut down almost a year ago.
···
On 9 March 2016 at 17:04, Captain Ishido <ishido@mailoo.org> wrote:
Le Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:24:43 +0530, > Karthikeyan A K <karthikeyan@openmailbox.org> a écrit :
> Hello People,
>
> Is ruby forge http://rubyforge.org/ down?
>It's up but « Could Not Connect to Database ».
So, I think we have to wait.
--
Matthew Kerwin
http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Could be a long wait, since RubyForge was shut down almost a year ago.
Wait, two years. Is it really 2016 already?
···
--
Matthew Kerwin
http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Not in Australia. But be patient. It takes a while to trickle down....
t.
···
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
Could be a long wait, since RubyForge was shut down almost a year ago.
Wait, two years. Is it really 2016 already?
--
Matthew Kerwin
http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-talk-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Believe that life is worth living and your belief will help create the
fact. ~ William James
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Cloyd, MS MA LMHC (WA)
Psychotherapist (psychological trauma, dissociative disorders)
Spokane, Washington, U.S.A: (435) 272-3332
<< tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email)
<< TomCloyd.com >> (website)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wouldn’t it make sense for rubyforge.org to perhaps redirect to rubygems.org/rubyforge, which is perhaps a page which explains what happened, when it happened, why it happened, etc?
Right now it’s just basically “Could not connect to database” which looks a bit odd.
Why the jerky tone? It's perfectly reasonable to suppose that Evan can
repoint the url to rubygems if prompted.
martin
···
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
On 09/03/2016 5:41 PM, "Samuel Williams" <space.ship.traveller@gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> Wouldn’t it make sense for rubyforge.org to perhaps redirect to
rubygems.org/rubyforge, which is perhaps a page which explains what
happened, when it happened, why it happened, etc?
>
> Right now it’s just basically “Could not connect to database” which
looks a bit odd.
>Probably. Let's go back to 2014 and suggest it to Evan. I'm not sure why
the web server is still responding, but I assume it's abandoned and will
evaporate when the various hosting agreements expire.
Wouldn’t it make sense for rubyforge.org to perhaps redirect to
rubygems.org/rubyforge, which is perhaps a page which explains what
happened, when it happened, why it happened, etc?
Right now it’s just basically “Could not connect to database” which looks
a bit odd.
Probably. Let's go back to 2014 and suggest it to Evan. I'm not sure why
the web server is still responding, but I assume it's abandoned and will
evaporate when the various hosting agreements expire.
···
On 09/03/2016 5:41 PM, "Samuel Williams" <space.ship.traveller@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, I'm just in a grumpy mood, and tired of people asking questions
along the lines of "why did <person who isn't part of the conversation> do
this thing this way, when I think it would be better done that way?" (Don't
ask us, ask him <https://twitter.com/evanphx>\.\)
The second part of my response still stands, though. From the looks of it,
the domain will lapse on 2016-07-03T19:46:14Z (It'll be sad when
http://rake.rubyforge.org/ eventually goes away 
)
···
On 9 March 2016 at 18:28, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> > wrote:
On 09/03/2016 5:41 PM, "Samuel Williams" <space.ship.traveller@gmail.com> >> wrote:
>
> Wouldn’t it make sense for rubyforge.org to perhaps redirect to
rubygems.org/rubyforge, which is perhaps a page which explains what
happened, when it happened, why it happened, etc?
>
> Right now it’s just basically “Could not connect to database” which
looks a bit odd.
>Probably. Let's go back to 2014 and suggest it to Evan. I'm not sure why
the web server is still responding, but I assume it's abandoned and will
evaporate when the various hosting agreements expire.Why the jerky tone? It's perfectly reasonable to suppose that Evan can
repoint the url to rubygems if prompted.
--
Matthew Kerwin
http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
I think Matthew was referring to the sadness of recognizing the passing of rake’s beloved and benevolent creator, Jim Weirich, not the actual fact of the website going down….
···
On Mar 9, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Quintus <quintus@quintilianus.eu> wrote:
Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> writes:
(It'll be sad when http://rake.rubyforge.org/ eventually goes away)
Why not use the alternative version at <http://docs.seattlerb.org/rake/>?
Greetings
Marvin--
#!/sbin/quintus
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.deGnuPG key: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-talk-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>
Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> writes:
(It'll be sad when http://rake.rubyforge.org/ eventually goes away)
Why not use the alternative version at <http://docs.seattlerb.org/rake/>?
Greetings
Marvin
David Zachrich <dzachrich@gmail.com> writes:
I think Matthew was referring to the sadness of recognizing the
passing of rake’s beloved and benevolent creator, Jim Weirich, not the
actual fact of the website going down….
Oh. I apologise. I didn’t make the connection between Rake’s RubyForge
site and Jim, though of course I am aware of Jim’s great work on Rake.
My apologies again.
Marvin
Wouldn’t it make sense to pay for this domain and get a redirect set up, rather than it becoming a crude pr0n site?