In article PGEPJIFLPEPOHCKEEEIKMEACDHAA.james@rubyxml.com,
- It would be alot of work for the complete RELAX NG schema
specification, but I don’t need all that. The alternative
seems to be write a parser by hand, or ditching XML altogether.Out of curosity, why are you using XML?
-
- Buzzword compliance mostly. Since we are designing this
protocol from scratch and have a very short deadline, I
foolishly thought existing XML tools would speed development.
( If we could use java this would probably be true. )
- Buzzword compliance mostly. Since we are designing this
XML also seems to be flexible enough to survive the
inenvidable tweaks that need to be added to a protocol
as time goes by. The problems we’ve had in the past have
been that our approaches weren’t flexible enough to deal
with unforseen requirements.
-
- Booker C. Bense