any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
modules
classes
methods
based on syntax method folding?
fold level won't cut it here since i might have
module A
module B
module C
module D
class C
def method
end
end
end
end
end
end
??
-a
Not sure I understand the problem.
Folding works for me. I have
set foldmethod=syntax
set foldnestmax=5 " usually 3, but more for this case
On 11/21/05, Ara.T.Howard <ara.t.howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
modules
classes
methodsbased on syntax method folding?
fold level won't cut it here since i might have
--
Jim Freeze
Ara.T.Howard wrote:
any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
modules
classes
methodsbased on syntax method folding?
No, I don't know.
fold level won't cut it here since i might have
module A
module B
module C
module D
class C
def method
end
end
end
end
end
end
Good question, though!
Gavin
This is exactly the problem I tried to solve in
http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Usable+Ruby+folding+for+Vim
HTH
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:33:23AM +0900, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
modules
classes
methods
--
Mauricio Fernandez
eigenclass.org has been down for ~4H this morning but it's back up, in case
you still want to take a look.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:55:51PM +0900, Mauricio Fernández wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:33:23AM +0900, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
>
> modules
> classes
> methodsThis is exactly the problem I tried to solve in
http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Usable+Ruby+folding+for+Vim
--
Mauricio Fernandez
Mauricio Fernández wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:55:51PM +0900, Mauricio Fernández wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:33:23AM +0900, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> > any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
> >
> > modules
> > classes
> > methods
>
> This is exactly the problem I tried to solve in
> http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Usable+Ruby+folding+for+Vimeigenclass.org has been down for ~4H this morning but it's back up, in case
you still want to take a look.
Gee, that looks awesome! Might be enough to get me to use folding...
Gavin
Mauricio Fernández wrote:
> > > any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
> > >
> > > modules
> > > classes
> > > methods
> >
> > This is exactly the problem I tried to solve in
> > http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Usable+Ruby+folding+for+Vim
>
> eigenclass.org has been down for ~4H this morning but it's back up, in case
> you still want to take a look.Gee, that looks awesome! Might be enough to get me to use folding...
I took a look at that. Quote: "On top of that, they're nested, so
you have to open folds recursively all the time.". Well, there is
zO (zed, capital Oh) and zC. when I first added folding to ruby's
syntax file, (a) it was rather a hack, and (b) I considered that
people might want to fold all sorts of things, particularly long if
while, etc, blocks that weren't relevant, seeing the wood for the
trees.
I don't actually understand how to use your script there...
Gavin
Hugh
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:55:51PM +0900, Mauricio Fernández wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:33:23AM +0900, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> > > > any ruby/vim gurus out there know how to fold only these:
> > > >
> > > > modules
> > > > classes
> > > > methods
> > >
> > > This is exactly the problem I tried to solve in
> > > http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Usable+Ruby+folding+for+Vim
> >
> > eigenclass.org has been down for ~4H this morning but it's back up, in case
> > you still want to take a look.
>
> Gee, that looks awesome! Might be enough to get me to use folding...I took a look at that. Quote: "On top of that, they're nested, so
you have to open folds recursively all the time.". Well, there is
zO (zed, capital Oh) and zC.
Of course, nobody would want to open them manually 
when I first added folding to ruby's syntax file, (a) it was rather a hack,
and (b) I considered that people might want to fold all sorts of things,
particularly long if while, etc, blocks that weren't relevant, seeing the
wood for the trees.
That makes sense; it just isn't what I want to use folds for
(intra-method inspection). I would like to keep methods small enough to
be easily inspected without requiring internal folds. You can actually
define them with specific markers (#{{{), but that wouldn't work so well
with "flat" (unnested) folds.
I don't actually understand how to use your script there...
It folds on class, module, constant and method definitions (you can change
that easily). It's probably more hackish than the syntax file, but I like it
the way it is It should work standalone, just by adding the script to
.vimrc. Then the :R command will set foldmethod=manual and create the folds,
which will be shown if foldenable is set (so zi might be required).
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:05:12AM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
--
Mauricio Fernandez
cream for vim allows you to fold any block of lines. cream makes
things easy for the vim newbie, but the full power of vim is just a
keystroke away.
Hugh Sasse wrote on 11/22/2005 11:05 AM:
syntax file, (a) it was rather a hack, and (b) I considered that
people might want to fold all sorts of things, particularly long if
while, etc, blocks that weren't relevant, seeing the wood for the
trees.
--
http://home.cogeco.ca/~tsummerfelt1
telnet://ventedspleen.dyndns.org