You don’t get to start telling people that after all the un-googled,
no-try, easily solvable questions YOU have been dumping to the channel. You
don’t get to flip the script on everyone else.
You were told that because you’ve done NO research on your own, you’re
asking every little teeny tiny question that pops into your head over and
over and over and over and over and over... ad nauseum to the list.
Take your OWN advise and publish what you googled, what the problem is,
what you expected to happen, what actually happened, why YOU *THINK* it
happened that way, etc. Show that you’re actually using your brain to try
to solve the problem FIRST before you ask us for help.
You don’t get to start telling others to follow that when you don’t follow
it yourself.
···
--
D. Deryl Downey
"The bug which you would fright me with I seek" - William Shakespeare -
The Winter's Tale, Act III, Scene II - A court of Justice.
*From:* Love U Ruby <lists@ruby-forum.com>
*Sent:* February 15, 2013 9:22 AM
*To:* ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
*Subject:* Re: Ruby Multithreaded producer-consumer problem
Abhijit Sarkar wrote in post #1097009:
I rewrote the code using MonitorMixin and then back to using Mutex, same
result. I used 2 ConditionVariable, same result If it's not working,
it's certainly not for the lack of trying.
How much have you tried? Your description not showing that.. You should
Google first.. Then try those all. Let us know what have you tried and
what you got.
You dont get to start telling people that after all the un-googled,
no-try, easily solvable questions YOU have been dumping to the channel.
You
dont get to flip the script on everyone else.
Who are you to tell me what I get to do? You've an opinion, that's fine,
almost everyone has one and that's why they say "an opinion is like a
a**hole, everyone has one". Keep it to yourself, don't start threads
trying to intimidate people because it is not going to work on me.
You were told that because youve done NO research on your own, youre
asking every little teeny tiny question that pops into your head over
and
over and over and over and over and over... ad nauseum to the list.
Before learning Ruby, you need to learn some English. "youre",
"nauseum", seriously?
You dont get to start telling others to follow that when you dont follow
it yourself.
Here's a good advice. Stand in front of a mirror and say that to
yourself.
I think he was talking to "Love U Ruby" not you...which means all of his
comments were 100% relevant, that guy has been spamming the list.
-Ryan
···
On 2/15/13 11:10 AM, Abhijit Sarkar wrote:
D. Deryl Downey wrote in post #1097087:
You dont get to start telling people that after all the un-googled,
no-try, easily solvable questions YOU have been dumping to the channel.
You
dont get to flip the script on everyone else.
Who are you to tell me what I get to do? You've an opinion, that's fine,
almost everyone has one and that's why they say "an opinion is like a
a**hole, everyone has one". Keep it to yourself, don't start threads
trying to intimidate people because it is not going to work on me.
You were told that because youve done NO research on your own, youre
asking every little teeny tiny question that pops into your head over
and
over and over and over and over and over... ad nauseum to the list.
Before learning Ruby, you need to learn some English. "youre",
"nauseum", seriously?
You dont get to start telling others to follow that when you dont follow
it yourself.
Here's a good advice. Stand in front of a mirror and say that to
yourself.
What nostalgia! It was AGES since I could witness a REAL, sparkling
flamewar...
Yuppie!!
Carlo
···
Subject: Re: Ruby Multithreaded producer-consumer problem
Date: sab 16 feb 13 02:10:00 +0900
--
* Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte,
* K * Carlo E. Prelz - fluido@fluido.as che bisogno ci sarebbe
* di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu)
I agree with Ryan, maybe it's the difference between seeing the threads on the forum and the mailing list ?
In the mailing list it appears as a reply to Love U Ruby's "go and google it" comment.
···
On 15 Feb 2013, at 17:17, Abhijit Sarkar <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
Ryan Victory wrote in post #1097122:
I think he was talking to "Love U Ruby" not you
Well he started a thread using the question I posted, so it's hard to
tell.
I agree with Ryan, maybe it's the difference between seeing the threads
on the forum and the mailing list ?
In the mailing list it appears as a reply to Love U Ruby's "go and
google it" comment.
If that's so, I've no problem apologizing to DDD. I was taken by
surprise by his unexpected post bashing, what seemed to be, me. I'll
send him a PM
If it's not working,
