What do you lot code ruby into?
Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
What do you lot code ruby into?
Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I quite like RadRails. Its got a few rough edges, but syntax
highlighting and database administration all seem to work.
On 07/05/06, Andrew Buchan <bfsog@hotmail.com> wrote:
What do you lot code ruby into?
Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
I've just started having a look at FreeRIDE, and took a little extra
time to install it from scratch. If anyone's interested, I put my
instructions up here: http://www.simisen.com/jmg/freeride.html . Note:
the FreeRIDE folks have an installer, which they recommend, and which
does most of that work for you.
I've got pretty high hopes for FreeRIDE: it's code is neat, seems
modular, and is fairly well-documented. It's licensed under the same
terms as Ruby itself too.
On 5/7/06, Andrew Buchan <bfsog@hotmail.com> wrote:
What do you lot code ruby into?
Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
I also use RadRails - or Scite if I just want to do something quick
in an editor that can highlight. Or vim on Linux where I don't have a GUI.
I have also used Arachnoruby and Freeride.
You can search the Ruby-talk archives, this question gets asked about
every two weeks.
On 5/7/06, Tom Marsh <ts.marsh@gmail.com> wrote:
I quite like RadRails. Its got a few rough edges, but syntax
highlighting and database administration all seem to work.
databus to keep all of the components loosely coupled. You can read about
the databus here:
http://freeride.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Databus
In FreeRIDE everything is a plugin (except the code responsible for loading
plugins). Even the GUI frontend is a plugin that uses FXRuby to render the
UI. There are plans to someday write a a wxRuby GUI plugin.
Curt
On 5/7/06, John Gabriele <jmg3000@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/7/06, Andrew Buchan <bfsog@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What do you lot code ruby into?
>
> Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
>I've just started having a look at FreeRIDE, and took a little extra
time to install it from scratch. If anyone's interested, I put my
instructions up here: http://www.simisen.com/jmg/freeride.html . Note:
the FreeRIDE folks have an installer, which they recommend, and which
does most of that work for you.I've got pretty high hopes for FreeRIDE: it's code is neat, seems
modular, and is fairly well-documented. It's licensed under the same
terms as Ruby itself too.FreeRide has a unique internal architecture that uses something call the
> I quite like RadRails. Its got a few rough edges, but syntax
> highlighting and database administration all seem to work.I also use RadRails - or Scite if I just want to do something quick
in an editor that can highlight. Or vim on Linux where I don't have a GUI.
I have also used Arachnoruby and Freeride.You can search the Ruby-talk archives, this question gets asked about
every two weeks.
I'm very pleased with Komodo, but it's very expensive ![]()
On 5/7/06, Leslie Viljoen <leslieviljoen@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/7/06, Tom Marsh <ts.marsh@gmail.com> wrote:
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.
Tremendously interesting architecture. Are you aware if the loose-coupled
slot architecture will work (or will someday work) with components
distributed across process spaces (especially, across a network)?
On 5/7/06, Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/7/06, John Gabriele <jmg3000@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/7/06, Andrew Buchan <bfsog@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > What do you lot code ruby into?
> >
> > Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
> >
>
> I've just started having a look at FreeRIDE, and took a little extra
> time to install it from scratch. If anyone's interested, I put my
> instructions up here: http://www.simisen.com/jmg/freeride.html . Note:
> the FreeRIDE folks have an installer, which they recommend, and which
> does most of that work for you.
>
> I've got pretty high hopes for FreeRIDE: it's code is neat, seems
> modular, and is fairly well-documented. It's licensed under the same
> terms as Ruby itself too.
>
> FreeRide has a unique internal architecture that uses something call the
databus to keep all of the components loosely coupled. You can read about
the databus here:http://freeride.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Databus
In FreeRIDE everything is a plugin (except the code responsible for
loading
plugins). Even the GUI frontend is a plugin that uses FXRuby to render the
UI. There are plans to someday write a a wxRuby GUI plugin.Curt
Curt Hibbs wrote:
On 5/7/06, John Gabriele <jmg3000@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/7/06, Andrew Buchan <bfsog@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What do you lot code ruby into?
>
> Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
>I've just started having a look at FreeRIDE, and took a little extra
time to install it from scratch. If anyone's interested, I put my
instructions up here: http://www.simisen.com/jmg/freeride.html . Note:
the FreeRIDE folks have an installer, which they recommend, and which
does most of that work for you.I've got pretty high hopes for FreeRIDE: it's code is neat, seems
modular, and is fairly well-documented. It's licensed under the same
terms as Ruby itself too.FreeRide has a unique internal architecture that uses something call the
databus to keep all of the components loosely coupled. You can read about
the databus here:http://freeride.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Databus
In FreeRIDE everything is a plugin (except the code responsible for loading
plugins). Even the GUI frontend is a plugin that uses FXRuby to render the
UI. There are plans to someday write a a wxRuby GUI plugin.Curt
Ruby RDE ( ruby dev env)
http://homepage2.nifty.com/sakazuki/rde_e.html
I've found this to the quite handy for windows work.
But main dev environment == Vim + 'whatever language plugins' fit the need.
There's no reason why it wouldn't. Of course there would be added latency
and you'd have to deal with the inherent unreliability of the network.
Curt
On 5/8/06, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
Tremendously interesting architecture. Are you aware if the loose-coupled
slot architecture will work (or will someday work) with components
distributed across process spaces (especially, across a network)?On 5/7/06, Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/7/06, John Gabriele <jmg3000@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/7/06, Andrew Buchan <bfsog@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > What do you lot code ruby into?
> > >
> > > Anything like and of bloodshed's or visual studio?
> > >
> >
> > I've just started having a look at FreeRIDE, and took a little extra
> > time to install it from scratch. If anyone's interested, I put my
> > instructions up here: http://www.simisen.com/jmg/freeride.html . Note:
> > the FreeRIDE folks have an installer, which they recommend, and which
> > does most of that work for you.
> >
> > I've got pretty high hopes for FreeRIDE: it's code is neat, seems
> > modular, and is fairly well-documented. It's licensed under the same
> > terms as Ruby itself too.
> >
> > FreeRide has a unique internal architecture that uses something call
the
> databus to keep all of the components loosely coupled. You can read
about
> the databus here:
>
> http://freeride.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Databus
>
> In FreeRIDE everything is a plugin (except the code responsible for
> loading
> plugins). Even the GUI frontend is a plugin that uses FXRuby to render
the
> UI. There are plans to someday write a a wxRuby GUI plugin.
>
> Curt
>