Is there a version of Ruby for DOS?
Like to use it to script unattended installations instead of using .bat files.
AndresGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
Hi,
···
In message “ruby for DOS” on 02/10/25, “Andres Hidalgo” sol123@msn.com writes:
Is there a version of Ruby for DOS?
Like to use it to script unattended installations instead of using .bat files.
Ruby can be compiled using djgpp, which requires 386 or later.
matz.
Yes,there is rubywin-0.0.3.8-i586-mswin32-1.6.zip.You do not need setup.Only unzip it and
set path.
“Andres Hidalgo” sol123@msn.com 写入消息新闻:OE129SntjcZCifKa1gq000127d4@hotmail.com…
Is there a version of Ruby for DOS?
Like to use it to script unattended installations instead of using …bat files.
Andres
Hello Yukihiro,
Friday, October 25, 2002, 11:13:03 AM, you wrote:
Is there a version of Ruby for DOS?
Like to use it to script unattended installations instead of using .bat files.
Ruby can be compiled using djgpp, which requires 386 or later.
btw, can ruby be compiled for 8086? or it is just too fat for 640K
barrier?
using ruby for developing control software for Pump Station will be
very fun 
···
–
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:bulatz@integ.ru
Hi,
···
In message “Re: ruby for DOS” on 02/10/25, “Bulat Ziganshin” bulatz@integ.ru writes:
btw, can ruby be compiled for 8086? or it is just too fat for 640K
barrier?
Ruby requires ‘sizeof(long) == sizeof(void*)’ which might be too
restrictive for plain 8086.
matz.
Hello Yukihiro,
Friday, October 25, 2002, 11:44:31 AM, you wrote:
Hi,
btw, can ruby be compiled for 8086? or it is just too fat for 640K
barrier?
Ruby requires ‘sizeof(long) == sizeof(void*)’ which might be too
restrictive for plain 8086.
this is true for large model. as i see, you never try to wrote
programs for 16-bit ms-dos
···
In message “Re: ruby for DOS” > on 02/10/25, “Bulat Ziganshin” bulatz@integ.ru writes:
–
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:bulatz@integ.ru
Hi,
The first time I understood the underlying Ruby object model, I also
thought that it would not be straightforward to port Ruby to some embedded
systems (with 8-bit or 16-bit processors). It appears that Ruby is really
optimized for “typical” (or even larger) computers. Probably it will be
just a matter of time before someone writes R2ME (Ruby 2 Micro
Edition)?
Regards,
Bill
···
Bulat Ziganshin bulatz@integ.ru wrote:
btw, can ruby be compiled for 8086? or it is just too fat for 640K
barrier?
Ruby requires ‘sizeof(long) == sizeof(void*)’ which might be too
restrictive for plain 8086.
this is true for large model. as i see, you never try to wrote
programs for 16-bit ms-dos