Before I start I'd like to say how happy I am for finding this forum,
and the mailing list. I'm very glad to find like-minded Ruby enthusiasts
like you guys!
Right, as you can see from the link below, I have a custom-made IDE, but
it's got a blank box that I'd like to fill with a debugging tool, but I
can't find one. I've searched google, but still can't find one that
provides debugging and a runtime debug log. Does anyone know of/use such
a tool, and can provide me a link?
Before I start I'd like to say how happy I am for finding this forum,
and the mailing list. I'm very glad to find like-minded Ruby enthusiasts
like you guys!
Right, as you can see from the link below, I have a custom-made IDE, but
it's got a blank box that I'd like to fill with a debugging tool, but I
can't find one. I've searched google, but still can't find one that
provides debugging and a runtime debug log. Does anyone know of/use such
a tool, and can provide me a link?
While not technically a debugger, you could run autotest in that spot.
(ZenTest is the gem providing it, IIRC).
IME, tests and the Ruby stack trace (once you know where to look at),
together with liberally sprinkled puts statements is more useful than a
debugger.
~ My behaviour is addictive functioning in a disease process of toxic
co-dependency. I need holistic healing and wellness before I'll accept
any responsibility for my actions. -- Calvin
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Phillip Gawlowski < cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sam Rudd wrote:
> Before I start I'd like to say how happy I am for finding this forum,
> and the mailing list. I'm very glad to find like-minded Ruby enthusiasts
> like you guys!
>
> Right, as you can see from the link below, I have a custom-made IDE, but
> it's got a blank box that I'd like to fill with a debugging tool, but I
> can't find one. I've searched google, but still can't find one that
> provides debugging and a runtime debug log. Does anyone know of/use such
> a tool, and can provide me a link?
While not technically a debugger, you could run autotest in that spot.
(ZenTest is the gem providing it, IIRC).
IME, tests and the Ruby stack trace (once you know where to look at),
together with liberally sprinkled puts statements is more useful than a
debugger.
~ My behaviour is addictive functioning in a disease process of toxic
co-dependency. I need holistic healing and wellness before I'll accept
any responsibility for my actions. -- Calvin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Sam Rudd wrote:
> Before I start I'd like to say how happy I am for finding this forum,
> and the mailing list. I'm very glad to find like-minded Ruby enthusiasts
> like you guys!
>
> Right, as you can see from the link below, I have a custom-made IDE, but
> it's got a blank box that I'd like to fill with a debugging tool, but I
> can't find one. I've searched google, but still can't find one that
> provides debugging and a runtime debug log. Does anyone know of/use such
> a tool, and can provide me a link?
While not technically a debugger, you could run autotest in that spot.
(ZenTest is the gem providing it, IIRC).
IME, tests and the Ruby stack trace (once you know where to look at),
together with liberally sprinkled puts statements is more useful than a
debugger.
~ My behaviour is addictive functioning in a disease process of toxic
co-dependency. I need holistic healing and wellness before I'll accept
any responsibility for my actions. -- Calvin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
I think you really also ought to look hard at ruby-debug. It's extremely useful, in my estimation. Zentest isn't quite the same approach to coding errors, of course, but is still outstanding.
Finally, as a third, and possibly best approach of all, do check out rspec.rubyforge.org.
I'm exploring all of these currently, and finding them all very much worth my time.
Tom
···
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Phillip Gawlowski < > cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> wrote:
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Cloyd, MS MA, LMHC
Private practice Psychotherapist
Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A: (360) 920-1226
<< tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email)
<< TomCloyd.com >> (website & psychotherapy weblog) << sleightmind.wordpress.com >> (mental health issues weblog)
<< directpathdesign.com >> (web site design & consultation)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm looking into ruby-debug, thanks. I'll keep the debug window open, but
once I get good enough at Ruby to make decent programs, I'll test as I go
using the built in tests.
Sorry if this posts twice, it keeps doing that for some reason.
I'm looking into ruby-debug, thanks. I'll keep the debug window open, but
once I get good enough at Ruby to make decent programs, I'll test as I go
using the built in tests.
You should use TDD from the start. It is a good habit to get into, and
it helps thinking about what you want to do, too.
I used to work without tests, and quickly learned my lesson. Now, if I
change something in my code base, errors get caught before I embarrass
myself in public.
I think that a debugger, for a languages like Ruby, is not really
useful. YMMV, though.
Sam Rudd wrote:
> I'm looking into ruby-debug, thanks. I'll keep the debug window open, but
> once I get good enough at Ruby to make decent programs, I'll test as I go
> using the built in tests.
You should use TDD from the start. It is a good habit to get into, and
it helps thinking about what you want to do, too.
I used to work without tests, and quickly learned my lesson. Now, if I
change something in my code base, errors get caught before I embarrass
myself in public.
I think that a debugger, for a languages like Ruby, is not really
useful. YMMV, though.
~ I'm killing time while I wait for life to shower me with meaning and
happiness. -- Calvin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Sam Rudd wrote:
> I'm looking into ruby-debug, thanks. I'll keep the debug window open, but
> once I get good enough at Ruby to make decent programs, I'll test as I go
> using the built in tests.
You should use TDD from the start. It is a good habit to get into, and
it helps thinking about what you want to do, too.
I used to work without tests, and quickly learned my lesson. Now, if I
change something in my code base, errors get caught before I embarrass
myself in public.
I think that a debugger, for a languages like Ruby, is not really
useful. YMMV, though.
~ I'm killing time while I wait for life to shower me with meaning and
happiness. -- Calvin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
I appreciate your point of view, Phillip. I was excited to work with ruby-debug, and I'm moving rapidly on to look at ZenTest and especially at rspec. I'm predicting to myself that I'm going to end up with the point of view you've just expressed. We'll see.
t.
···
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Cloyd, MS MA, LMHC
Private practice Psychotherapist
Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A: (360) 920-1226
<< tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email)
<< TomCloyd.com >> (website & psychotherapy weblog) << sleightmind.wordpress.com >> (mental health issues weblog)
<< directpathdesign.com >> (web site design & consultation)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~