Excerpts from James Britt's mail of 2 Sep 2004 (EDT):
Well, what would be handy all around would be a client-side tool that
let you edit stuff and then magically FTP|XML-RPC|WebDAV the results
to a a server.
Emacs has ange-ftp mode, which lets you treat remote ftp servers as if
they were local directories. (Also see tramp mode if you want scp/rcp
instead of ftp.) Not exactly what you want, perhaps, but maybe close.
--
William <wmorgan-ruby-talk@masanjin.net>
Armin Roehrl <armin@xss.de> writes:
[ ... ]
I hacked an ugly tiny cgi-script for a friend.
All it does:
it's a form where you enter the text and specify the format.
Then it gets saved on the server where I run rublog.
There is a 2nd cgi-script that allows deleting, editing,
making/deleting categories.If anybody wants a copy, email me.
Ciao,
-A
I would love to see these tiny cgi scripts. Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
- Lloyd
--
Lloyd Zusman
ljz@asfast.com
God bless you.
You'll need to get the CVS tarball from RubyForge; Dave hasn't made a
release in a while. 
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 02:25:36 +0900, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov <ara.t.howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 2, 2004, at 11:21, Jamis Buck wrote:
>
>>Well, if I had shell access to the box on which my blog is
>> published, your CVS approach would be wonderful. Unfortunately, all I
>> have is FTP... But wait a minute; am I a Ruby programmer, or aren't I?
>>
>> certainly prefer the web interface to a
>> text-editor/local-web-server/upload-process approach. It would
>> certainly make Rublog that much more attractive to the
>> "non-programming-casual-blogger" demographic.
>
> I'd happily roll that in if you wanted to add an extension. It'd have
> to offer a choice of markup languages, and should ideally support some
> minimal workflow (pending to active). I'd probably see it as being a
> separate CGI that shared libraries with RubLog, rather than necessarily
> being part of the same application, but I could be swayed either way.dave-
downloaded 0.8.0 from sourceforge (no download on rubyforge?). in any case,
trying to fire it up and getting errors regarding 'require "markup/xxx"'. did
a 'cp -r /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8./rdoc ./markup' and that has fixed many of
the problems. i'm wondering, however, has the installed directory hierarchy
of rdoc changed, or is this a bug?btw. so far it seems to run under webrick o.k. - at least i'm getting
something.-a
--> EMAIL :: Ara [dot] T [dot] Howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
> PHONE :: 303.497.6469
> A flower falls, even though we love it;
> and a weed grows, even though we do not love it.
> --Dogen
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
* Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca
: as of this email, I have [ 6 ] Gmail invitations
The sourceforge project is seriously out of date, but they won't let me delete it. Use the CVS version on RubyForge.
At some point I'll put together a file release there, but in the meantime the CVS one is stable (it's what I use for my blog)
Cheers
Dave
On Sep 2, 2004, at 12:25, Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov wrote:
downloaded 0.8.0 from sourceforge (no download on rubyforge?). in any case,
trying to fire it up and getting errors regarding 'require "markup/xxx"'. did
a 'cp -r /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8./rdoc ./markup' and that has fixed many of
the problems. i'm wondering, however, has the installed directory hierarchy
of rdoc changed, or is this a bug?